A prospective, randomized comparison of workhorse guidewires for bifurcation percutaneous coronary intervention
Prospective data collection assessing the difference of wiring time as a clinical endpoint is feasible. Our study results can form a basis for future studies comparing different guidewires.
Authors
- Kristina Gifft (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7361-5725)
- Jann‐Yuan Wang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3406-366X)
- Toshinori Hirai (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1480-2197)
- Quang A. Le (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4968-9334)
- Albert P.C. Chan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4853-6440)
- Chirag Bavishi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6405-1606)
- Krista Schoff
- Arun Kumar (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3669-5401)
- Zahoor Ahmad (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9663-2509)
- Smita Kothari (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8934-5694)
- Poorna R. Karuparthi
- Charles Donigian
Institutions
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- Harry S. Truman Memorial Veterans' Hospital (US)
- University of Missouri (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Minerva Cardiology and Angiology
- Published
- 2025-09-18
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.23736/s2724-5683.25.06812-7
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.01