Nonlinear in-plane response of 3D-printed concrete walls with varied infill patterns: Experimental mix design and numerical structural assessment

This study investigates the nonlinear in-plane structural behavior of 3D-printed concrete wall elements with two representative internal infill patterns ‒ lattice (L) and triangular (T) ‒ using finite element modeling informed by experimentally derived material properties. A printable concrete mixture was specifically developed using CEM I 42.5 R Portland cement, silica sand, and hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) as a viscosity-modifying agent. Conventional cast specimens (40×40×160 mm³) achieved a 28-day flexural strength of 8.7 MPa and a compressive strength of approximately 63 MPa. Nonlinear behavior of wall panels with both infill types was investigated using numerical methods with advanced constitutive laws. These models account for the distinct compressive–tensile response of concrete and damage evolution under monotonic lateral loading, allowing assessment of the influence of geometry on load-bearing capacity and failure mechanisms. The results reveal that both infill patterns exhibit nonlinear load–displacement responses with an initial elastic regime, an early localized cracking peak, followed by a notable recovery in load-bearing capacity, and subsequently a global peak load prior to progressive post-peak softening. While the overall performance of both infill types was comparable, the T pattern exhibited a marginally higher peak load (1.7–2.7%) and improved ductility relative to the L form. These distinctions are attributed to the T-pattern’s more efficient diagonal force transfer and the development of a single continuous diagonal shear band, as opposed to the L-pattern’s multiple discontinuous cracks and broader damage zones.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics
Published
2025-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20528/cjsmec.2025.03.005
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nonlinear in-plane response of 3D-printed concrete walls with varied infill patterns: Experimental mix design and numerical structural assessment

Yeşim Tarhan, İsmail Hakkı Tarhan
1 citations
Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics
Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
1.01
article

Nonlinear in-plane response of 3D-printed concrete walls with varied infill patterns: Experimental mix design and numerical structural assessment

Yeşim Tarhan, İsmail Hakkı Tarhan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study investigates the nonlinear in-plane structural behavior of 3D-printed concrete wall elements with two representative internal infill patterns ‒ lattice (L) and triangular (T) ‒ using finite element modeling informed by experimentally derived material properties. A printable concrete mixture was specifically developed using CEM I 42.5 R Portland cement, silica sand, and hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) as a viscosity-modifying agent. Conventional cast specimens (40×40×160 mm³) achieved a 28-day flexural strength of 8.7 MPa and a compressive strength of approximately 63 MPa. Nonlinear behavior of wall panels with both infill types was investigated using numerical methods with advanced constitutive laws. These models account for the distinct compressive–tensile response of concrete and damage evolution under monotonic lateral loading, allowing assessment of the influence of geometry on load-bearing capacity and failure mechanisms. The results reveal that both infill patterns exhibit nonlinear load–displacement responses with an initial elastic regime, an early localized cracking peak, followed by a notable recovery in load-bearing capacity, and subsequently a global peak load prior to progressive post-peak softening. While the overall performance of both infill types was comparable, the T pattern exhibited a marginally higher peak load (1.7–2.7%) and improved ductility relative to the L form. These distinctions are attributed to the T-pattern’s more efficient diagonal force transfer and the development of a single continuous diagonal shear band, as opposed to the L-pattern’s multiple discontinuous cracks and broader damage zones.

Challenge Journal of Structural MechanicsVol. 11(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
1.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.