Comparison of Surface Current Measurement Techniques and Observations of Tidal Inlet Dynamics Using Unmanned Aerial Systems

Abstract Understanding mixing dynamics through barrier island inlets requires large-scale observations of tidal exchange near the bay–ocean boundary, including reliable measurements of surface currents. In this paper, we evaluate the ocean surface currents at Galveston Bay inlet and Freeport Harbor inlet, Texas, from a video sequence of surface waves collected from a small, unmanned aerial system (UAS). Surface current measurements from three different measurement techniques (UAS wave-based current mapping, particle image velocimetry, and optical flow) were compared with and without the presence of artificial floating tracer particles. When used, tracer particles of packaging peanuts were released using a payload-capable UAS platform. Particle image velocimetry (PIV) and optical flow methods estimated coherent surface currents consistent with the motion of uniform, well-distributed seeding particles drifting upon the spectral surface waves and the near-surface currents. Without seeding particles, the UAS wave-based current mapping technique captured the near-surface currents at tidal inlets. The UAS wave-based current mapping technique (Streßer et al.), which does not require particle seeding, is further validated using in situ measurements of current velocity from an acoustic Doppler current profiler (ADCP). The UAS wave-based surface current measurements agreed with the ADCP measurements within a root-mean-square error (RMSE) of 0.06 m s −1 and 16° in magnitude and direction, respectively, and a normalized RMSE (NRMSE) of 0.26 in magnitude. The surface currents near the jetty at Galveston Bay inlet were visualized with the resulting UAS wave-based current maps.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
Published
2025-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1175/jtech-d-24-0118.1
Primary Topic
Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Surface Current Measurement Techniques and Observations of Tidal Inlet Dynamics Using Unmanned Aerial Systems

H.‐L. Huang, Scott A. Socolofsky, Kuang‐An Chang, Soo Bum Bae
Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
article

Comparison of Surface Current Measurement Techniques and Observations of Tidal Inlet Dynamics Using Unmanned Aerial Systems

H.‐L. Huang, Scott A. Socolofsky, Kuang‐An Chang, Soo Bum Bae
article en

Abstract

Abstract Understanding mixing dynamics through barrier island inlets requires large-scale observations of tidal exchange near the bay–ocean boundary, including reliable measurements of surface currents. In this paper, we evaluate the ocean surface currents at Galveston Bay inlet and Freeport Harbor inlet, Texas, from a video sequence of surface waves collected from a small, unmanned aerial system (UAS). Surface current measurements from three different measurement techniques (UAS wave-based current mapping, particle image velocimetry, and optical flow) were compared with and without the presence of artificial floating tracer particles. When used, tracer particles of packaging peanuts were released using a payload-capable UAS platform. Particle image velocimetry (PIV) and optical flow methods estimated coherent surface currents consistent with the motion of uniform, well-distributed seeding particles drifting upon the spectral surface waves and the near-surface currents. Without seeding particles, the UAS wave-based current mapping technique captured the near-surface currents at tidal inlets. The UAS wave-based current mapping technique (Streßer et al.), which does not require particle seeding, is further validated using in situ measurements of current velocity from an acoustic Doppler current profiler (ADCP). The UAS wave-based surface current measurements agreed with the ADCP measurements within a root-mean-square error (RMSE) of 0.06 m s −1 and 16° in magnitude and direction, respectively, and a normalized RMSE (NRMSE) of 0.26 in magnitude. The surface currents near the jetty at Galveston Bay inlet were visualized with the resulting UAS wave-based current maps.

Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic TechnologyVol. 42(11)
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US), Texas College (US), Professional Services Group (United States) (US), Texas A&M University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.