EFLM checklist for the assessment of AI/ML studies in laboratory medicine: enhancing general medical AI frameworks for laboratory-specific applications

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) into laboratory medicine shows promise for advancing diagnostic, prognostic, and decision-support tools; however, routine clinical implementation remains limited and heterogeneous. Laboratory data presents unique methodological and semantic complexities - method dependency, analyte-specific variation, and contextual sensitivity-not adequately addressed by general-purpose AI reporting guidelines. To bridge this gap, the EFLM Committee on Digitalisation and Artificial Intelligence (C-AI) proposes an expanded checklist to support assessment of requirements and recommendations for the development of AI/ML models based on laboratory data. Building upon the widely adopted ChAMAI checklist (Checklist for assessment of medical AI), our proposal introduces six additional items, each grounded in the CRoss Industry Standard Process for Data Mining (CRISP-DM) framework and tailored to the specificities of laboratory workflows. These extensions address: (1) explicit documentation of laboratory data characteristics; (2) consideration of biological and analytical variability; (3) the role of metadata and peridata in contextualizing results; (4) analyte harmonization and standardization practices; (5) rigorous external validation with attention to dataset similarity; and (6) the implementation of FAIR data principles for transparency and reproducibility. Together, these recommendations aim to foster robust, interpretable, and generalizable AI systems that are fit for deployment in clinical laboratory settings. By incorporating these laboratory-aware considerations into model development pipelines, researchers and practitioners can enhance both the scientific rigor and practical applicability of AI tools. We advocate for the adoption of this extended checklist by developers, reviewers, and regulators to promote trustworthy and reproducible AI in laboratory medicine.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
Published
2025-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2025-0841
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.93
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EFLM checklist for the assessment of AI/ML studies in laboratory medicine: enhancing general medical AI frameworks for laboratory-specific applications

Habib Özdemir, Federico Cabitza, Johannes Elias, Alexander Tolios et al.
6 citations
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
3.93
article

EFLM checklist for the assessment of AI/ML studies in laboratory medicine: enhancing general medical AI frameworks for laboratory-specific applications

Habib Özdemir, Federico Cabitza, Johannes Elias, Alexander Tolios, Hanoch Goldshmidt, Anna Carobene, Sander De Bruyne, Janne Cadamuro, Andrea Padoan, Glynis Frans, Zeljiko Debeljak, Salomón Martín Pérez, William van Doorn, Helena Lame
article en
6 citations

Abstract

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) into laboratory medicine shows promise for advancing diagnostic, prognostic, and decision-support tools; however, routine clinical implementation remains limited and heterogeneous. Laboratory data presents unique methodological and semantic complexities - method dependency, analyte-specific variation, and contextual sensitivity-not adequately addressed by general-purpose AI reporting guidelines. To bridge this gap, the EFLM Committee on Digitalisation and Artificial Intelligence (C-AI) proposes an expanded checklist to support assessment of requirements and recommendations for the development of AI/ML models based on laboratory data. Building upon the widely adopted ChAMAI checklist (Checklist for assessment of medical AI), our proposal introduces six additional items, each grounded in the CRoss Industry Standard Process for Data Mining (CRISP-DM) framework and tailored to the specificities of laboratory workflows. These extensions address: (1) explicit documentation of laboratory data characteristics; (2) consideration of biological and analytical variability; (3) the role of metadata and peridata in contextualizing results; (4) analyte harmonization and standardization practices; (5) rigorous external validation with attention to dataset similarity; and (6) the implementation of FAIR data principles for transparency and reproducibility. Together, these recommendations aim to foster robust, interpretable, and generalizable AI systems that are fit for deployment in clinical laboratory settings. By incorporating these laboratory-aware considerations into model development pipelines, researchers and practitioners can enhance both the scientific rigor and practical applicability of AI tools. We advocate for the adoption of this extended checklist by developers, reviewers, and regulators to promote trustworthy and reproducible AI in laboratory medicine.

Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)Vol. 64(1)
University of Padua (IT), Bar-Ilan University (IL), Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (IT), Rega Institute for Medical Research (BE), Paracelsus Medical University (AT), Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center (IL), Maastricht University Medical Centre (NL), Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven (BE), Mother Teresa Hospital (AL), Ghent University (BE), Maastricht University (NL), Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena (ES), Jessa Hospital (BE), Istituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio (IT), Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality (TR), VIB-KU Leuven Center for Microbiology (BE), University of Osijek (HR), University of Milano-Bicocca (IT), Medical University of Vienna (AT), KU Leuven (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
3.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.