Artificial Intelligence Bias in Health Communication: Risks and Strategies for Medical Writers

Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly changing the field of health communication. Medical writers, who are central to making complex medical information understandable and usable, now face both new opportunities and new risks. AI can speed up content creation, improve workflow efficiency, and scale production. At the same time, it introduces concerns related to bias, accuracy, and accountability. This paper focuses on 3 core types of bias that affect AI-generated content: data-driven bias, algorithmic bias, and human bias. These biases often arise from unrepresentative training data, flawed system design, or lack of contextual understanding. Left unchecked, they can lead to misinformation and worsen health disparities. Medical writers play a critical role in mitigating these risks by evaluating AI outputs for accuracy, completeness, and fairness. When guided by clear standards, collaborative practices, and sound editorial judgments, medical writers can help ensure that AI supports ethical, equitable, and effective health communication. This paper offers practical strategies to help medical writers integrate AI tools responsibly without compromising the integrity, ethics, or patient equity of health communication.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AMWA Journal
Published
2025-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55752/amwa.2025.479
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial Intelligence Bias in Health Communication: Risks and Strategies for Medical Writers

Red Thaddeus Miguel, Manal El Joumaa, Rami Ali
AMWA Journal
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Artificial Intelligence Bias in Health Communication: Risks and Strategies for Medical Writers

Red Thaddeus Miguel, Manal El Joumaa, Rami Ali
article en

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly changing the field of health communication. Medical writers, who are central to making complex medical information understandable and usable, now face both new opportunities and new risks. AI can speed up content creation, improve workflow efficiency, and scale production. At the same time, it introduces concerns related to bias, accuracy, and accountability. This paper focuses on 3 core types of bias that affect AI-generated content: data-driven bias, algorithmic bias, and human bias. These biases often arise from unrepresentative training data, flawed system design, or lack of contextual understanding. Left unchecked, they can lead to misinformation and worsen health disparities. Medical writers play a critical role in mitigating these risks by evaluating AI outputs for accuracy, completeness, and fairness. When guided by clear standards, collaborative practices, and sound editorial judgments, medical writers can help ensure that AI supports ethical, equitable, and effective health communication. This paper offers practical strategies to help medical writers integrate AI tools responsibly without compromising the integrity, ethics, or patient equity of health communication.

AMWA JournalVol. 40(3)
Kaneka (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.