Do Local Governments Listen to the Experts? A Comprehensive Qualitative Analysis of Local Economic Development Policies

Research on local economic development (LED) policy remains limited in its access to detailed information about what policies are practiced where. This study helps to fill important gaps with a unique data set of 106 localities’ responses to Amazon.com's 2017 “HQ2” RFP. These data are analyzed qualitatively to assess patterns in policy practice and their relationship to local characteristics. Highlighting the balance between use of incentives to firms versus broader public investments, we find that most localities embrace a relatively balanced mix of the two in ways that suggest isomorphic decision making. Localities practicing extremely high numbers of development policies specialize in either firm-level incentives or public investments, a choice that appears to be associated with local incomes. All policy mix categories include diverse types of localities, indicating significant room to maneuver. These findings offer new perspectives on the range and sources of local approaches to place-based policy and community development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Urban Affairs Review
Published
2025-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10780874251367021
Primary Topic
Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do Local Governments Listen to the Experts? A Comprehensive Qualitative Analysis of Local Economic Development Policies

Seth Pipkin
Urban Affairs Review
Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis
article

Do Local Governments Listen to the Experts? A Comprehensive Qualitative Analysis of Local Economic Development Policies

Seth Pipkin
article en

Abstract

Research on local economic development (LED) policy remains limited in its access to detailed information about what policies are practiced where. This study helps to fill important gaps with a unique data set of 106 localities’ responses to Amazon.com's 2017 “HQ2” RFP. These data are analyzed qualitatively to assess patterns in policy practice and their relationship to local characteristics. Highlighting the balance between use of incentives to firms versus broader public investments, we find that most localities embrace a relatively balanced mix of the two in ways that suggest isomorphic decision making. Localities practicing extremely high numbers of development policies specialize in either firm-level incentives or public investments, a choice that appears to be associated with local incomes. All policy mix categories include diverse types of localities, indicating significant room to maneuver. These findings offer new perspectives on the range and sources of local approaches to place-based policy and community development.

Urban Affairs Review
University of California, Irvine (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.