Abstract B113: Cultivating transdisciplinary collaboration for cancer disparities: A phased evaluation and adaptive curriculum design

Abstract Addressing persistent cancer disparities necessitates strong transdisciplinary collaboration. Our program, Research and Community Scholars within the Community and Cancer Science Network at the Medical College of Wisconsin, was designed to train community members and biomedical researchers in effective partnership. This abstract details the developmental evaluation and adaptive redesign of our curriculum across four cohorts, highlighting key learnings and their impact on program evolution. We developed a 9-month curriculum for community scholars and research scholars (basic science and clinical fellows) focusing on cancer disparities, social determinants of health, and interdisciplinary communication. The program utilizes didactic and experiential learning, culminating in collaborative projects. Through a human-centered design approach, we continually evaluated the curriculum's impact using pre/post-assessments, qualitative reflections, and leadership team observations. Insights from each cohort informed successive programmatic adaptations, focusing on curriculum depth, in-person engagement, project clarity, and relationship building. Across four cohorts (n=45 enrolled, n=35 completed), we observed significant evolution in scholar engagement and program outcomes. Cohort 1 2021-2022 (Virtual): Identified a need for deeper curriculum content. Cohort 2 2022-2023 (First In-Person, n=6-8): Showcased improved scholar tone, deeper personal and professional growth, and sustained relationships, enhanced by strong peer engagement and a smaller cohort size. Cohort 3 2023-2024: Scholars deepened their understanding of cancer disparities' "why" and reframed approaches to be more human-centered. While projects had richer content and scholars felt more empowered, challenges emerged regarding project purpose clarity, high scholar dropout, and interpersonal conflicts, signaling a need to improve the scholar experience. Cohort 4 2024-2025 (Project Overhaul): An iterative redesign, informed by human-centered design tools and an "Emergent Learning Table," led to a new "transdisciplinary design process." This fostered greater real-world application and understanding of community-academic partnerships, reducing emphasis on the project as merely a deliverable. However, this cohort experienced the highest turnover rate (∼50%) and challenges with unclear expectations and uneven effort in larger groups, hindering desired deeper relationships across the entire cohort. Our collaborative process demonstrates that while the core curriculum content is robust, effective transdisciplinary collaboration training requires continuous adaptation, particularly in fostering relationship building and formalizing structures to support full, equitable engagement. Future iterations will focus on clarifying the transdisciplinary design process upfront, setting explicit expectations for group work, and building consistent opportunities for deep scholar-to-scholar and scholar-to-leadership relationships to enhance accountability, retention, and a safe learning environment. Citation Format: Jayme Ewens. Cultivating transdisciplinary collaboration for cancer disparities: A phased evaluation and adaptive curriculum design [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 18th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities; 2025 Sep 18-21; Baltimore, MD. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2025;34(9 Suppl):Abstract nr B113.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention
Published
2025-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7755.disp25-b113
Primary Topic
Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract B113: Cultivating transdisciplinary collaboration for cancer disparities: A phased evaluation and adaptive curriculum design

Jayme Ewens
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention
Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
article

Abstract B113: Cultivating transdisciplinary collaboration for cancer disparities: A phased evaluation and adaptive curriculum design

Jayme Ewens
article en

Abstract

Abstract Addressing persistent cancer disparities necessitates strong transdisciplinary collaboration. Our program, Research and Community Scholars within the Community and Cancer Science Network at the Medical College of Wisconsin, was designed to train community members and biomedical researchers in effective partnership. This abstract details the developmental evaluation and adaptive redesign of our curriculum across four cohorts, highlighting key learnings and their impact on program evolution. We developed a 9-month curriculum for community scholars and research scholars (basic science and clinical fellows) focusing on cancer disparities, social determinants of health, and interdisciplinary communication. The program utilizes didactic and experiential learning, culminating in collaborative projects. Through a human-centered design approach, we continually evaluated the curriculum's impact using pre/post-assessments, qualitative reflections, and leadership team observations. Insights from each cohort informed successive programmatic adaptations, focusing on curriculum depth, in-person engagement, project clarity, and relationship building. Across four cohorts (n=45 enrolled, n=35 completed), we observed significant evolution in scholar engagement and program outcomes. Cohort 1 2021-2022 (Virtual): Identified a need for deeper curriculum content. Cohort 2 2022-2023 (First In-Person, n=6-8): Showcased improved scholar tone, deeper personal and professional growth, and sustained relationships, enhanced by strong peer engagement and a smaller cohort size. Cohort 3 2023-2024: Scholars deepened their understanding of cancer disparities' "why" and reframed approaches to be more human-centered. While projects had richer content and scholars felt more empowered, challenges emerged regarding project purpose clarity, high scholar dropout, and interpersonal conflicts, signaling a need to improve the scholar experience. Cohort 4 2024-2025 (Project Overhaul): An iterative redesign, informed by human-centered design tools and an "Emergent Learning Table," led to a new "transdisciplinary design process." This fostered greater real-world application and understanding of community-academic partnerships, reducing emphasis on the project as merely a deliverable. However, this cohort experienced the highest turnover rate (∼50%) and challenges with unclear expectations and uneven effort in larger groups, hindering desired deeper relationships across the entire cohort. Our collaborative process demonstrates that while the core curriculum content is robust, effective transdisciplinary collaboration training requires continuous adaptation, particularly in fostering relationship building and formalizing structures to support full, equitable engagement. Future iterations will focus on clarifying the transdisciplinary design process upfront, setting explicit expectations for group work, and building consistent opportunities for deep scholar-to-scholar and scholar-to-leadership relationships to enhance accountability, retention, and a safe learning environment. Citation Format: Jayme Ewens. Cultivating transdisciplinary collaboration for cancer disparities: A phased evaluation and adaptive curriculum design [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 18th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities; 2025 Sep 18-21; Baltimore, MD. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2025;34(9 Suppl):Abstract nr B113.

Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & PreventionVol. 34(9_Supplement)
Medical College of Wisconsin (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.