Comparison of Visual Representations in Junior Secondary School Geography Textbooks on Continental Drift and Plate Tectonics

This research examines 39 visual representations from junior secondary school geography textbooks in China, the US, and the UK, themed “Continental Drift and Plate Tectonics”. This study employs content analysis and the revised Graphical Analysis Protocol (GAP) to evaluate graphics and their integration with text. Two indicators are considered while assessing graphics: Systematicity and Graphic form. The integration of graphics with text is evaluated based on five indicators: Contiguity, Indexical reference, Captions, Semantic relations, and Level of connection. The findings indicate that the geographic schematic map is the primary graphic form utilized in all textbooks. Graphics often exhibit a low degree of systematicity, and most visual representations depict representational semantic relations. PEP and MH demonstrate significant parallels regarding contiguity and indexical reference, with graphics physically associated with related text, and the text includes references to the graphics. Only OUP employs engaging captions.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
X-Disciplinarity
Published
2025-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63174/xdi.qwln3131
Primary Topic
Geography Education and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Visual Representations in Junior Secondary School Geography Textbooks on Continental Drift and Plate Tectonics

Tianyi Zhang, Wenqing Sun
X-Disciplinarity
Geography Education and Pedagogy
article

Comparison of Visual Representations in Junior Secondary School Geography Textbooks on Continental Drift and Plate Tectonics

Tianyi Zhang, Wenqing Sun
article en

Abstract

This research examines 39 visual representations from junior secondary school geography textbooks in China, the US, and the UK, themed “Continental Drift and Plate Tectonics”. This study employs content analysis and the revised Graphical Analysis Protocol (GAP) to evaluate graphics and their integration with text. Two indicators are considered while assessing graphics: Systematicity and Graphic form. The integration of graphics with text is evaluated based on five indicators: Contiguity, Indexical reference, Captions, Semantic relations, and Level of connection. The findings indicate that the geographic schematic map is the primary graphic form utilized in all textbooks. Graphics often exhibit a low degree of systematicity, and most visual representations depict representational semantic relations. PEP and MH demonstrate significant parallels regarding contiguity and indexical reference, with graphics physically associated with related text, and the text includes references to the graphics. Only OUP employs engaging captions.

X-DisciplinarityVol. 1(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Geography Education and Pedagogy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.