The roots of liberal and illiberal democracy: political theory, collective memory and conflicting visions of sovereignty in Europe

The fall of communism in 1989 ended the division the European continent, allowing the states previously trapped behind the iron curtain to ‘return’ to Europe. Following the accession of the first postcommunist states to the European Union in 2004, however, new divisions regarding their differing understandings of democracy emerged. My basic thesis is that these divergent understandings of liberal and ‘illiberal’ democracy–which correspond to the theoretical division between liberal rights protection and the republican tradition based on majoritarian popular sovereignty–are rooted in collective remembrance. Whereas memory cultures organized around the defeat of National Socialism in 1945 emphasize the need to protect fundamental human rights, those organized around the fall of communism in 1989 emphasize domestic popular sovereignty. Building on Jürgen Habermas’s discursive model, I argue that a European public sphere is necessary to mediate these between these different memories and the differing conceptions of the democracy they foster.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Contemporary European Studies
Published
2025-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2025.2563562
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Eastern European Communism and Reforms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The roots of liberal and illiberal democracy: political theory, collective memory and conflicting visions of sovereignty in Europe

Peter J. Verovšek
1 citations
Journal of Contemporary European Studies
Eastern European Communism and Reforms
4.20
article

The roots of liberal and illiberal democracy: political theory, collective memory and conflicting visions of sovereignty in Europe

Peter J. Verovšek
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The fall of communism in 1989 ended the division the European continent, allowing the states previously trapped behind the iron curtain to ‘return’ to Europe. Following the accession of the first postcommunist states to the European Union in 2004, however, new divisions regarding their differing understandings of democracy emerged. My basic thesis is that these divergent understandings of liberal and ‘illiberal’ democracy–which correspond to the theoretical division between liberal rights protection and the republican tradition based on majoritarian popular sovereignty–are rooted in collective remembrance. Whereas memory cultures organized around the defeat of National Socialism in 1945 emphasize the need to protect fundamental human rights, those organized around the fall of communism in 1989 emphasize domestic popular sovereignty. Building on Jürgen Habermas’s discursive model, I argue that a European public sphere is necessary to mediate these between these different memories and the differing conceptions of the democracy they foster.

Journal of Contemporary European StudiesVol. 33(4)
University of Groningen (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Eastern European Communism and Reforms
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.