A third way: off-team practice educators in social work education

In Social Work, Practice Educators (PEs) are termed ‘on-site’ or ‘off-site’ depending on whether they work in the same location as the student they are supporting, or are ‘physically located away from the learners practice area’. Here, we trial and examine a third model: ‘off-team’ practice education. An off-team PE works in the same local authority (LA) as the student but in a different team, providing some familiarity and distance. We hypothesized that this model could be more favorable to LAs, providing some advantages of off-site and on-site models. Using focus groups, we explored student and PE experiences of the off-team model and compared them with experiences of the on-site model. We found that off team education offers a viable pathway for supporting students, but there are differences to recognize to maximize advantages and mitigate disadvantages. The significance of our study for practice education lies in its exploration of the potentials and limitations of the off-team model, particularly regarding supervision, assessment, and the development of professional relationships. We conclude by offering reflections on how educators might more effectively operationalize both on-site and off-team models to maximize their respective strengths.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Work Education
Published
2025-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2025.2563175
Primary Topic
Social Work Education and Practice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A third way: off-team practice educators in social work education

Elizabeth Rimmer, Gillian Buck, Vanessa Goldsmith, Matthew Rive
Social Work Education
Social Work Education and Practice
article

A third way: off-team practice educators in social work education

Elizabeth Rimmer, Gillian Buck, Vanessa Goldsmith, Matthew Rive
article en

Abstract

In Social Work, Practice Educators (PEs) are termed ‘on-site’ or ‘off-site’ depending on whether they work in the same location as the student they are supporting, or are ‘physically located away from the learners practice area’. Here, we trial and examine a third model: ‘off-team’ practice education. An off-team PE works in the same local authority (LA) as the student but in a different team, providing some familiarity and distance. We hypothesized that this model could be more favorable to LAs, providing some advantages of off-site and on-site models. Using focus groups, we explored student and PE experiences of the off-team model and compared them with experiences of the on-site model. We found that off team education offers a viable pathway for supporting students, but there are differences to recognize to maximize advantages and mitigate disadvantages. The significance of our study for practice education lies in its exploration of the potentials and limitations of the off-team model, particularly regarding supervision, assessment, and the development of professional relationships. We conclude by offering reflections on how educators might more effectively operationalize both on-site and off-team models to maximize their respective strengths.

Social Work Education
University of Chester (GB), Edge Hill University (GB), University of Manchester (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Social Work Education and Practice
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.