Impact of line of sight structure on weak lensing observables of galaxy clusters

Weak gravitational lensing observations of galaxy clusters are sensitive to all the mass that is present along the line of sight (LoS). Thus, the systematic and additional statistical uncertainties due to intervening structures must be taken into consideration. In this work, we quantify the impact of these structures on the recovery of mass density profile parameters using 967 clusters from the highest-resolution FLAMINGO simulation. We constructed mock weak-lensing maps, which included both single source plane mocks at redshifts up to z s ≤ 3, along with Euclid-like mocks with a realistic source redshift distribution. Applying Bayesian inference with Nautilus , we fit spherical and elliptical Navarro-Frenk-White (NFW) models to recover the cluster mass, concentration, axis ratio, and centre. We used these parameters to measure the brightest cluster galaxy (BCG) offset from the potential centre (or BCG wobble). We find that the spherical model fits clusters along under-dense sight lines better than those along over-dense ones. This introduces a positive skew in the relative error distributions for mass and concentration, which increases with source redshift. In Euclid-like mocks, this results in a mean mass bias of +5.3 ± 1.4% (significant at 3.5 σ ) when assuming a spherical NFW model. We also detected a mean axis ratio bias of −2.0 ± 0.7% (2.9 σ ), with no significant bias in concentration. We measured a BCG wobble of ∼14 kpc in our Euclid-like mocks, with a negligible contribution from LoS structure. Furthermore, we predicted the scatter in mass estimates from future weak lensing surveys with mean source redshifts of z s ≳ 1.2 (e.g. Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope) would end up dominated by LoS structure. Hence, assuming a diagonal covariance matrix will lead to an overestimation in terms of precision. We conclude that cluster weak-lensing pipelines should be calibrated on simulations with light cone data to properly account for the significant impact of LoS structure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Published
2025-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202555162
Primary Topic
Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of line of sight structure on weak lensing observables of galaxy clusters

Joop Schaye, James Nightingale, Matthieu Schaller, David Harvey et al.
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
article

Impact of line of sight structure on weak lensing observables of galaxy clusters

Joop Schaye, James Nightingale, Matthieu Schaller, David Harvey, Ethan Tregidga, Felix Vecchi
article en

Abstract

Weak gravitational lensing observations of galaxy clusters are sensitive to all the mass that is present along the line of sight (LoS). Thus, the systematic and additional statistical uncertainties due to intervening structures must be taken into consideration. In this work, we quantify the impact of these structures on the recovery of mass density profile parameters using 967 clusters from the highest-resolution FLAMINGO simulation. We constructed mock weak-lensing maps, which included both single source plane mocks at redshifts up to z s ≤ 3, along with Euclid-like mocks with a realistic source redshift distribution. Applying Bayesian inference with Nautilus , we fit spherical and elliptical Navarro-Frenk-White (NFW) models to recover the cluster mass, concentration, axis ratio, and centre. We used these parameters to measure the brightest cluster galaxy (BCG) offset from the potential centre (or BCG wobble). We find that the spherical model fits clusters along under-dense sight lines better than those along over-dense ones. This introduces a positive skew in the relative error distributions for mass and concentration, which increases with source redshift. In Euclid-like mocks, this results in a mean mass bias of +5.3 ± 1.4% (significant at 3.5 σ ) when assuming a spherical NFW model. We also detected a mean axis ratio bias of −2.0 ± 0.7% (2.9 σ ), with no significant bias in concentration. We measured a BCG wobble of ∼14 kpc in our Euclid-like mocks, with a negligible contribution from LoS structure. Furthermore, we predicted the scatter in mass estimates from future weak lensing surveys with mean source redshifts of z s ≳ 1.2 (e.g. Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope) would end up dominated by LoS structure. Hence, assuming a diagonal covariance matrix will lead to an overestimation in terms of precision. We conclude that cluster weak-lensing pipelines should be calibrated on simulations with light cone data to properly account for the significant impact of LoS structure.

Astronomy and AstrophysicsVol. 703
Leiden University (NL), Instituto de Física Teórica (ES), Observatoire Midi-Pyrénées (FR), Newcastle University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.