School Exclusion and Youth Custody

Abstract Objective This paper studies whether the disciplinary practice of temporarily excluding children from school causally affects their probability of experiencing incarceration as a young person (youth custody). Methodology We use linked administrative data on the full population of English secondary school leavers between 2010 and 2013. To isolate the causal impact of exclusion from confounding factors, we employ an instrumental variables approach. Our instrument is academization, a reform program that gave schools increased autonomy over disciplinary procedures, thus quasi-randomly affecting a student's probability of being excluded. Results We find that schools significantly increased fixed-term exclusions by approximately 1 percentage point after academization. Our results show that fixed-term exclusions caused a 2.5 percentage point increase in the probability of a student being in youth custody by age 18. Conclusions This finding highlights a direct causal link between a common school disciplinary practice and a severe, long-term negative outcome for young people. It underscores the importance for policymakers and educators to recognize the potential risks associated with disciplinary procedures and the need for alternative, less harmful interventions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Quantitative Criminology
Published
2025-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-025-09626-6
Primary Topic
Education Discipline and Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

School Exclusion and Youth Custody

Richard Dorsett, Giulia Tagliaferri, Veruska Oppedisano, Alex Sutherland et al.
Journal of Quantitative Criminology
Education Discipline and Inequality
article

School Exclusion and Youth Custody

Richard Dorsett, Giulia Tagliaferri, Veruska Oppedisano, Alex Sutherland, Gerda Buchmueller, Claire Cathro
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objective This paper studies whether the disciplinary practice of temporarily excluding children from school causally affects their probability of experiencing incarceration as a young person (youth custody). Methodology We use linked administrative data on the full population of English secondary school leavers between 2010 and 2013. To isolate the causal impact of exclusion from confounding factors, we employ an instrumental variables approach. Our instrument is academization, a reform program that gave schools increased autonomy over disciplinary procedures, thus quasi-randomly affecting a student's probability of being excluded. Results We find that schools significantly increased fixed-term exclusions by approximately 1 percentage point after academization. Our results show that fixed-term exclusions caused a 2.5 percentage point increase in the probability of a student being in youth custody by age 18. Conclusions This finding highlights a direct causal link between a common school disciplinary practice and a severe, long-term negative outcome for young people. It underscores the importance for policymakers and educators to recognize the potential risks associated with disciplinary procedures and the need for alternative, less harmful interventions.

Journal of Quantitative Criminology
Oxford Policy Management (GB), The Behavioural Insights Team (GB), University of Westminster (GB)
Nuffield Foundation, Royal Economic Society
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Education Discipline and Inequality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.