Machine learning based scaling relations for mass, radius, and age of Solar-like oscillating stars

ABSTRACT We investigate scaling relations for stellar mass, radius, and age in stars exhibiting solar-like oscillations using two observational data sets comprising 110 stars. Using data set 1 (80 stars), we derive empirical scaling relations incorporating asteroseismic parameters – the frequency of maximum oscillation power, large, and small frequency separations – alongside effective temperature and metallicity. To account for non-Gaussian uncertainties in the stellar parameters, we employ an ensemble machine learning approach that combines Ridge, Huber, and Gradient Boosting regressors to predict stellar mass, radius, and age, along with deriving the corresponding coefficients for the scaling relations. We assess coefficient uncertainties by combining jackknife and bootstrap resampling techniques. Using the resulting scaling relations, we predict the mass, radius, and age of 30 stars in data set 2. These predictions closely match observational data, even when the parameters slightly differ from those in the training set. The predicted stellar ages range from 2.29 to 10.09 Gyr, consistent with Solar-like oscillators. Our findings show that combining machine learning regression with resampling-based uncertainty estimation provides an effective and reliable approach for deriving scaling relations, offering valuable insights for stellar characterization in asteroseismic research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Letters
Published
2025-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnrasl/slaf068
Primary Topic
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine learning based scaling relations for mass, radius, and age of Solar-like oscillating stars

Hossein Safari, Salar Abbasvand, A. Hasanzadeh, Nasibe Alipour
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Letters
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
article

Machine learning based scaling relations for mass, radius, and age of Solar-like oscillating stars

Hossein Safari, Salar Abbasvand, A. Hasanzadeh, Nasibe Alipour
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT We investigate scaling relations for stellar mass, radius, and age in stars exhibiting solar-like oscillations using two observational data sets comprising 110 stars. Using data set 1 (80 stars), we derive empirical scaling relations incorporating asteroseismic parameters – the frequency of maximum oscillation power, large, and small frequency separations – alongside effective temperature and metallicity. To account for non-Gaussian uncertainties in the stellar parameters, we employ an ensemble machine learning approach that combines Ridge, Huber, and Gradient Boosting regressors to predict stellar mass, radius, and age, along with deriving the corresponding coefficients for the scaling relations. We assess coefficient uncertainties by combining jackknife and bootstrap resampling techniques. Using the resulting scaling relations, we predict the mass, radius, and age of 30 stars in data set 2. These predictions closely match observational data, even when the parameters slightly differ from those in the training set. The predicted stellar ages range from 2.29 to 10.09 Gyr, consistent with Solar-like oscillators. Our findings show that combining machine learning regression with resampling-based uncertainty estimation provides an effective and reliable approach for deriving scaling relations, offering valuable insights for stellar characterization in asteroseismic research.

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society LettersVol. 544(1)
University of Warwick (GB), University of Guilan (IR), University of Zanjan (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.