Expected Trainee Interpretive Volumes and Potential Threats to Neuroradiology Program Viability: A Survey of Neuroradiology Fellowship Program Directors

Reasonable interpretive volumes determined by fellowship directors ranged between 20-30 daily cases for fellows and 32-38.5 daily cases for faculty working with fellows. Common barriers to interpretation were related to phone call interruptions and protocoling. Perceived major program viability threats remain centered on increasing clinical volumes and burnout.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Published
2025-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.a8821
Primary Topic
Radiology practices and education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Expected Trainee Interpretive Volumes and Potential Threats to Neuroradiology Program Viability: A Survey of Neuroradiology Fellowship Program Directors

Srinivasan Vedantham, Mari Hagiwara, Karen Buch, James Y. Chen
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Radiology practices and education
article

Expected Trainee Interpretive Volumes and Potential Threats to Neuroradiology Program Viability: A Survey of Neuroradiology Fellowship Program Directors

Srinivasan Vedantham, Mari Hagiwara, Karen Buch, James Y. Chen
article en

Abstract

Reasonable interpretive volumes determined by fellowship directors ranged between 20-30 daily cases for fellows and 32-38.5 daily cases for faculty working with fellows. Common barriers to interpretation were related to phone call interruptions and protocoling. Perceived major program viability threats remain centered on increasing clinical volumes and burnout.

American Journal of NeuroradiologyVol. 46(10)
San Francisco VA Medical Center (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), Banner - University Medical Center Tucson (US), New York University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Radiology practices and education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.