Towards a more pluralistic approach to evaluating the farm-level impacts of new breeding technologies in sub-Saharan Africa

The Green Revolution's objective of increasing yields precipitated an approach to impact evaluation that relied predominantly on econometric analyses to measure yield differences and how those differences impact farmer incomes. This paper explores the legacies of this assessment scholarship for New Breeding Technologies (NBTs) in sub-Saharan Africa. It examines three pervasive assumptions underpinning econometric-informed evaluative approaches: farmer homogeneity, profit maximization, and scale neutrality. The paper concludes by introducing Farming Systems Research as a complement to existing econometric approaches, which can serve to create more robust and accurate assessments of the potential farm-level benefits and challenges of NBTs in sub-Saharan Africa.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Genome
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1139/gen-2025-0023
Primary Topic
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Towards a more pluralistic approach to evaluating the farm-level impacts of new breeding technologies in sub-Saharan Africa

Helena Shilomboleni, Alanna Taylor, Matthew A. Schnurr, Brian Dowd‐Uribe
Genome
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
article

Towards a more pluralistic approach to evaluating the farm-level impacts of new breeding technologies in sub-Saharan Africa

Helena Shilomboleni, Alanna Taylor, Matthew A. Schnurr, Brian Dowd‐Uribe
article en

Abstract

The Green Revolution's objective of increasing yields precipitated an approach to impact evaluation that relied predominantly on econometric analyses to measure yield differences and how those differences impact farmer incomes. This paper explores the legacies of this assessment scholarship for New Breeding Technologies (NBTs) in sub-Saharan Africa. It examines three pervasive assumptions underpinning econometric-informed evaluative approaches: farmer homogeneity, profit maximization, and scale neutrality. The paper concludes by introducing Farming Systems Research as a complement to existing econometric approaches, which can serve to create more robust and accurate assessments of the potential farm-level benefits and challenges of NBTs in sub-Saharan Africa.

GenomeVol. 68
Dalhousie University (CA), University of Waterloo (CA), University of San Francisco (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.