On the role of symmetry and geometry in global quantum sensing
Abstract Global quantum sensing enables parameter estimation across arbitrary ranges with a finite number of measurements. Among the various existing formulations, the Bayesian paradigm stands as a flexible approach for optimal protocol design under minimal assumptions. Within this paradigm, however, there are two fundamentally different ways to capture prior ignorance and uninformed estimation; namely, requiring invariance of the prior distribution under specific parameter transformations, or adhering to the geometry of a state space. In this paper we carefully examine the practical consequences of both the invariance-based and the geometry-based approaches, and show how to apply them in relevant examples of rate and coherence estimation in noisy settings. We find that, while the invariance-based approach often leads to simpler priors and estimators and is more broadly applicable in adaptive scenarios, the geometry-based one can lead to faster posterior convergence in a well-defined measurement setting. Crucially, by employing the notion of location-isomorphic parameters, we are able to unify the two formulations into a single practical and versatile framework for optimal global quantum sensing, detailing when and how each set of assumptions should be employed to tackle any given estimation task. We thus provide a blueprint for the design of novel high-precision quantum sensors.
Authors
- Jonas Glatthard (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8411-4958)
- Luis Alfonso Correa (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7357-1328)
- Jesús Rubio (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8193-8273)
- Edward Gandar (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4328-1979)
- Stefan Nimmrichter (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9566-3824)
- Julia Boeyens (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5028-1491)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Quantum Science and Technology
- Published
- 2025-09-18
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1088/2058-9565/ae08e1
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Experimental and Theoretical Physics Studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 1.32