Social Media Weakens Users’ Critical Thinking and Requires Strategic Responses

As social media becomes more and more popular, it has an increasing impact on the way people think. Many platforms recommend content based on criteria such as the number of likes and view time, a mechanism that makes emotional, one-sided and even misleading information more likely to be seen, while issues that are truly insightful and can help us think are instead buried. By reviewing data and analysing the policies of several countries (e.g., Germany, UK, EU, US, Singapore, China) and major platforms (e.g., Meta, YouTube, X, and TikTok), this study tries to figure out the causes of these problems and what current policies do well and what they don't do well. The study found that while countries and platforms have taken some measures to manage social media content, such as removing false information, protecting youth, and publishing transparency reports, many of the policies still lack coherence and platform governance is not open and transparent enough. At the same time, most of the current policies only focus on ‘content’, but neglect the understanding and judgement of the users themselves, especially adults, who rarely have the opportunity to receive relevant education or improve their information literacy. This paper suggests that the government, platforms, and society should work together to improve the transparency of platform governance, develop diverse recommendation algorithms, strengthen user education on information literacy, especially for young users, and establish a long-term, open, and monitorable regulatory system. It is hoped that through the cooperation of all parties, social media can become a space conducive to reflection and rational dialogue.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Humanities and Social Sciences
Published
2025-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54691/66fks596
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Social Media Weakens Users’ Critical Thinking and Requires Strategic Responses

Yuzhuo Xie
Frontiers in Humanities and Social Sciences
Misinformation and Its Impacts
article

Social Media Weakens Users’ Critical Thinking and Requires Strategic Responses

Yuzhuo Xie
article en

Abstract

As social media becomes more and more popular, it has an increasing impact on the way people think. Many platforms recommend content based on criteria such as the number of likes and view time, a mechanism that makes emotional, one-sided and even misleading information more likely to be seen, while issues that are truly insightful and can help us think are instead buried. By reviewing data and analysing the policies of several countries (e.g., Germany, UK, EU, US, Singapore, China) and major platforms (e.g., Meta, YouTube, X, and TikTok), this study tries to figure out the causes of these problems and what current policies do well and what they don't do well. The study found that while countries and platforms have taken some measures to manage social media content, such as removing false information, protecting youth, and publishing transparency reports, many of the policies still lack coherence and platform governance is not open and transparent enough. At the same time, most of the current policies only focus on ‘content’, but neglect the understanding and judgement of the users themselves, especially adults, who rarely have the opportunity to receive relevant education or improve their information literacy. This paper suggests that the government, platforms, and society should work together to improve the transparency of platform governance, develop diverse recommendation algorithms, strengthen user education on information literacy, especially for young users, and establish a long-term, open, and monitorable regulatory system. It is hoped that through the cooperation of all parties, social media can become a space conducive to reflection and rational dialogue.

Frontiers in Humanities and Social SciencesVol. 5(9)
University of Glasgow (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.