Evaluation of Input Sampling Methods for Deep-Learning-Based Semantic Segmentation of Large-Scale 3D Point Clouds

Abstract. 3D point clouds used in geospatial applications typically contain billions of points. Processing 3D point clouds of this size as a whole with deep learning models requires computational resources (e.g., GPU memory) that are usually not available. To obtain 3D point clouds that can be processed by deep learning models, sampling methods that produce local subsets of large-scale 3D point clouds with a smaller extent or lower density are essential. Nonetheless, the impact of different input sampling methods on the semantic segmentation performance of deep learning models has received little attention so far. In this paper, we compare three widely used input sampling techniques (random sampling, farthest point sampling, and grid sampling) concerning the semantic segmentation performance of different deep learning architectures, using inputs of different spatial extents. We consider both indoor and outdoor scenarios, using the Stanford Large-Scale 3D Indoor Spaces and Paris-CARLA-3D datasets as reference datasets. We find that random and grid sampling outperform farthest point sampling in terms of segmentation performance, with mean intersection-over-union scores of approximately 0.6, while random sampling displays the fastest execution time. For indoor scenarios, using input 3D point clouds with a small spatial extent (i.e., 1m) yields the best results. For outdoor scenarios, similar performance is obtained for all tested input extents. In an additional experiment, we evaluate a curvature-weighted sampling approach to test whether geometric features derived from 3D point clouds can guide the selection of more informative input points for deep learning models. However, we find that using curvature as a sampling criterion decreases the segmentation performance, indicating a mismatch between the expected relevance of high-curvature points (e.g., points representing object borders) and the internally learned features of the deep learning models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ISPRS annals of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences
Published
2025-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-x-4-w6-2025-49-2025
Primary Topic
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of Input Sampling Methods for Deep-Learning-Based Semantic Segmentation of Large-Scale 3D Point Clouds

Josafat-Mattias Burmeister, Rico Richter, Gilberto Ochoa‐Ruiz, Jorge Francisco Ciprián-Sánchez
ISPRS annals of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
article

Evaluation of Input Sampling Methods for Deep-Learning-Based Semantic Segmentation of Large-Scale 3D Point Clouds

Josafat-Mattias Burmeister, Rico Richter, Gilberto Ochoa‐Ruiz, Jorge Francisco Ciprián-Sánchez
article en

Abstract

Abstract. 3D point clouds used in geospatial applications typically contain billions of points. Processing 3D point clouds of this size as a whole with deep learning models requires computational resources (e.g., GPU memory) that are usually not available. To obtain 3D point clouds that can be processed by deep learning models, sampling methods that produce local subsets of large-scale 3D point clouds with a smaller extent or lower density are essential. Nonetheless, the impact of different input sampling methods on the semantic segmentation performance of deep learning models has received little attention so far. In this paper, we compare three widely used input sampling techniques (random sampling, farthest point sampling, and grid sampling) concerning the semantic segmentation performance of different deep learning architectures, using inputs of different spatial extents. We consider both indoor and outdoor scenarios, using the Stanford Large-Scale 3D Indoor Spaces and Paris-CARLA-3D datasets as reference datasets. We find that random and grid sampling outperform farthest point sampling in terms of segmentation performance, with mean intersection-over-union scores of approximately 0.6, while random sampling displays the fastest execution time. For indoor scenarios, using input 3D point clouds with a small spatial extent (i.e., 1m) yields the best results. For outdoor scenarios, similar performance is obtained for all tested input extents. In an additional experiment, we evaluate a curvature-weighted sampling approach to test whether geometric features derived from 3D point clouds can guide the selection of more informative input points for deep learning models. However, we find that using curvature as a sampling criterion decreases the segmentation performance, indicating a mismatch between the expected relevance of high-curvature points (e.g., points representing object borders) and the internally learned features of the deep learning models.

ISPRS annals of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciencesVol. X-4/W6-2025
Hasso Plattner Institute (DE), University of Potsdam (DE)
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.