To Change in China

Abstract This article brings together sources from China, the United States, the United Kingdom, and France to explore the rare and fraught cases of Americans and Europeans who attempted to become naturalized subjects in late-nineteenth-century Qing China. Decades before China established its first formal law on citizenship, foreigners, especially foreign military experts, were trying and occasionally succeeding in naturalizing as Chinese. I see naturalization as one of many ad hoc collaborations within the period’s Self-Strengthening movement. Yet the place of China in the nineteenth century’s global debates on naturalization remains little known. More than just a product of silences, I argue that this is the result of a deliberate erasure, primarily achieved through historic efforts by Euro-American powers to deny the legitimacy of white naturalization in China. Despite small numbers of applicants, these powers quickly came to perceive the possibility as a threat to broader racial hierarchies they were constructing in Asia. Reconstructing and contextualizing these cases serves to expand the story of modern nationality in China, and to reinsert China into a global history with present-day implications. Ultimately, I argue, it was the lines drawn around China here that most shaped the boundaries of modern naturalization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The American Historical Review
Published
2025-07-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ahr/rhaf305
Primary Topic
Asian American and Pacific Histories
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

To Change in China

Nicholas McGee
The American Historical Review
Asian American and Pacific Histories
article

To Change in China

Nicholas McGee
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article brings together sources from China, the United States, the United Kingdom, and France to explore the rare and fraught cases of Americans and Europeans who attempted to become naturalized subjects in late-nineteenth-century Qing China. Decades before China established its first formal law on citizenship, foreigners, especially foreign military experts, were trying and occasionally succeeding in naturalizing as Chinese. I see naturalization as one of many ad hoc collaborations within the period’s Self-Strengthening movement. Yet the place of China in the nineteenth century’s global debates on naturalization remains little known. More than just a product of silences, I argue that this is the result of a deliberate erasure, primarily achieved through historic efforts by Euro-American powers to deny the legitimacy of white naturalization in China. Despite small numbers of applicants, these powers quickly came to perceive the possibility as a threat to broader racial hierarchies they were constructing in Asia. Reconstructing and contextualizing these cases serves to expand the story of modern nationality in China, and to reinsert China into a global history with present-day implications. Ultimately, I argue, it was the lines drawn around China here that most shaped the boundaries of modern naturalization.

The American Historical ReviewVol. 130(3)
Durham University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Asian American and Pacific Histories
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

To Change in China — Nicholas McGee · The American Historical Review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS