Human-Autonomy Command in safety–critical EDGE operations

Operations in contested mission environments require a balanced composition of competency, authority, and responsibility, underpinned by comprehensive operational awareness in order to provide the context, insight and foresight is required for effective command. While human intervention would be necessary directly acting or supervising some operational tasks, other tasks can only be accomplished by non-human intelligent entities, autonomously sensing, processing, deciding and acting within and between different operational domains and dimensions. Human-Autonomy Teams are Complex Adaptive Systems, able to accurately and rapidly sense, process and interpret relevant events and circumstances in order to sustain and improve decision-making and action, enabling wide-ranging appreciation of and influence on agents and effects in the Operating Environment. This calls for technologies that are able to autonomously engage with its environment, without continuous human supervision. Based on recent studies and with the support from other fields of study, we devised a number of elements of cognitive command and decision-making in a special case of complex Multi-Domain Operations. Emergent, Dynamic, Global and Evolutionary (EDGE) operations require flexible, adaptive, and high-performance human and technological (hybrid) cognitive capabilities, sustaining comprehensive operational awareness and situation understanding. This work formulates future work towards a future-oriented Essence of Human-Autonomy Command in EDGE operations, comprising strategic capability elements with equal relevance and applicability on human and Autonomous Adaptive Agents. It will be grounded in adaptive and versatile command and execution principles, supported by hierarchical knowledge structures, where the Human-Autonomy Command approach is superior regarding managing and maintaining operational availability, versatility, and efficiency.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Human-Intelligent Systems Integration
Published
2025-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42454-025-00075-x
Primary Topic
Risk and Safety Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Human-Autonomy Command in safety–critical EDGE operations

Arne Norlander
Human-Intelligent Systems Integration
Risk and Safety Analysis
article

Human-Autonomy Command in safety–critical EDGE operations

Arne Norlander
article en

Abstract

Operations in contested mission environments require a balanced composition of competency, authority, and responsibility, underpinned by comprehensive operational awareness in order to provide the context, insight and foresight is required for effective command. While human intervention would be necessary directly acting or supervising some operational tasks, other tasks can only be accomplished by non-human intelligent entities, autonomously sensing, processing, deciding and acting within and between different operational domains and dimensions. Human-Autonomy Teams are Complex Adaptive Systems, able to accurately and rapidly sense, process and interpret relevant events and circumstances in order to sustain and improve decision-making and action, enabling wide-ranging appreciation of and influence on agents and effects in the Operating Environment. This calls for technologies that are able to autonomously engage with its environment, without continuous human supervision. Based on recent studies and with the support from other fields of study, we devised a number of elements of cognitive command and decision-making in a special case of complex Multi-Domain Operations. Emergent, Dynamic, Global and Evolutionary (EDGE) operations require flexible, adaptive, and high-performance human and technological (hybrid) cognitive capabilities, sustaining comprehensive operational awareness and situation understanding. This work formulates future work towards a future-oriented Essence of Human-Autonomy Command in EDGE operations, comprising strategic capability elements with equal relevance and applicability on human and Autonomous Adaptive Agents. It will be grounded in adaptive and versatile command and execution principles, supported by hierarchical knowledge structures, where the Human-Autonomy Command approach is superior regarding managing and maintaining operational availability, versatility, and efficiency.

Human-Intelligent Systems IntegrationVol. 7(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Risk and Safety Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.