Anticipatory identity control: Upstream governance on digital platforms

This commentary examines the entrenchment of authoritarian governance through the algorithmic architectures of major digital platforms. As identity formation increasingly occurs in online spaces, the capacity to explore, articulate, and inhabit non-normative or politically inconvenient subjectivities is contingent upon the technical affordances and moderation protocols of the platforms that mediate digital public life. Authoritarian regimes have capitalized on this dependency, embedding ideological control both in content policy and in the infrastructural substrate of platforms themselves. These developments reflect a mode of algorithmic sovereignty in which the state's authority over identity is operationalized through digital infrastructure rather than direct censorship alone. This commentary argues that such infrastructural interventions constitute a form of anticipatory governance: preemptively structuring the field of possible selves to align with state-sanctioned norms. In doing so, they reshape digital identity not as an open-ended process, but as a site of containment, coercion, and control.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dialogues on Digital Society
Published
2025-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/29768640251377164
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Anticipatory identity control: Upstream governance on digital platforms

Emerson Johnston
1 citations
Dialogues on Digital Society
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
4.20
article

Anticipatory identity control: Upstream governance on digital platforms

Emerson Johnston
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This commentary examines the entrenchment of authoritarian governance through the algorithmic architectures of major digital platforms. As identity formation increasingly occurs in online spaces, the capacity to explore, articulate, and inhabit non-normative or politically inconvenient subjectivities is contingent upon the technical affordances and moderation protocols of the platforms that mediate digital public life. Authoritarian regimes have capitalized on this dependency, embedding ideological control both in content policy and in the infrastructural substrate of platforms themselves. These developments reflect a mode of algorithmic sovereignty in which the state's authority over identity is operationalized through digital infrastructure rather than direct censorship alone. This commentary argues that such infrastructural interventions constitute a form of anticipatory governance: preemptively structuring the field of possible selves to align with state-sanctioned norms. In doing so, they reshape digital identity not as an open-ended process, but as a site of containment, coercion, and control.

Dialogues on Digital SocietyVol. 1(3)
Stanford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Anticipatory identity control: Upstream governance on digital platforms — Emerson Johnston · Dialogues on Digital Society (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS