How App Developers’ Boundary-Shifting Moves Reshape Competitive Dynamics

As digital platforms evolve, app developers do more than passively participate; they actively reshape the competitive landscape through boundary-shifting moves (BSMs). By modularizing boundary resources at different levels of the technology stack, developers can provoke, delay, or neutralize competitive responses in hypercompetitive app markets. Drawing on an empirical analysis of mobile apps launched by leading Chinese internet firms, we uncover a striking asymmetry in how rival developers react to these moves. Specifically, higher-level app modules—those tailored to particular application domains—tend to delay rival responses, while lower-level technical modules—broadly applicable across domains—trigger faster competitive reactions. This effect is heightened among firms with a history of direct competition, as they respond more aggressively to changes at the lower levels of modularization. By foregrounding the strategic role of technology stack levels in shaping competitive interactions, our study advances a differential resourcing perspective and offers new insights into the dynamics of competition within digital platforms. These findings challenge the dominant host platform-centric and cooperative views on boundary resources, illuminating how app developers actively reshape platform ecosystems to gain temporary advantage.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
MIS Quarterly
Published
2025-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25300/misq/2025/18060
Primary Topic
Digital Platforms and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How App Developers’ Boundary-Shifting Moves Reshape Competitive Dynamics

Arun Rai, Hengqi Tian
MIS Quarterly
Digital Platforms and Economics
article

How App Developers’ Boundary-Shifting Moves Reshape Competitive Dynamics

Arun Rai, Hengqi Tian
article en

Abstract

As digital platforms evolve, app developers do more than passively participate; they actively reshape the competitive landscape through boundary-shifting moves (BSMs). By modularizing boundary resources at different levels of the technology stack, developers can provoke, delay, or neutralize competitive responses in hypercompetitive app markets. Drawing on an empirical analysis of mobile apps launched by leading Chinese internet firms, we uncover a striking asymmetry in how rival developers react to these moves. Specifically, higher-level app modules—those tailored to particular application domains—tend to delay rival responses, while lower-level technical modules—broadly applicable across domains—trigger faster competitive reactions. This effect is heightened among firms with a history of direct competition, as they respond more aggressively to changes at the lower levels of modularization. By foregrounding the strategic role of technology stack levels in shaping competitive interactions, our study advances a differential resourcing perspective and offers new insights into the dynamics of competition within digital platforms. These findings challenge the dominant host platform-centric and cooperative views on boundary resources, illuminating how app developers actively reshape platform ecosystems to gain temporary advantage.

MIS QuarterlyVol. 49(4)
University of Denver (US), University of Colorado Denver (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Digital Platforms and Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

How App Developers’ Boundary-Shifting Moves Reshape Competitive Dynamics — Arun Rai, Hengqi Tian · MIS Quarterly (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS