Wind Field Modeling over Hilly Terrain: A Review of Methods, Challenges, Limitations, and Future Directions

Accurate wind field modeling over hilly terrain is critical for wind energy, infrastructure safety, and environmental assessment, yet its inherent complexity poses significant simulation challenges. This paper systematically reviews this field’s major advances by analyzing 610 key publications from 2015 to 2024, selected from core databases (e.g., Web of Science and Scopus) through targeted keyword searches (e.g., ‘wind flow’, ‘complex terrain’, ‘CFD’, ‘hilly’) and subsequent rigorous relevance screening. We critique four primary modeling paradigms—field measurements, wind tunnel experiments, Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD), and data-driven methods—across three key application areas, filling a gap left by previous single-focus reviews. The analysis confirms CFD’s dominance (75% of studies), with a clear shift from idealized 2D to real 3D terrain. Key findings indicate that high-fidelity coupled models (e.g., LES), validated against benchmark field experiments such as Perdigão, can reduce mean wind speed prediction bias to below 0.1 m/s; and optimized engineering designs for mountainous infrastructure can mitigate local wind speed amplification effects by 15–20%. Data-driven surrogate models, represented by FuXi-CFD, show revolutionary potential, reducing the inference time for high-resolution wind fields from hours to seconds, though they currently lack standardized validation. Finally, this review summarizes persistent challenges and outlines future directions, advocating for physics-informed neural networks, high-fidelity multi-scale models, and the establishment of open-access benchmark datasets.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2025-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app151810186
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Wind and Air Flow Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Wind Field Modeling over Hilly Terrain: A Review of Methods, Challenges, Limitations, and Future Directions

Weijia Wang, Fubin Chen
4 citations
Applied Sciences
Wind and Air Flow Studies
3.20
article

Wind Field Modeling over Hilly Terrain: A Review of Methods, Challenges, Limitations, and Future Directions

Weijia Wang, Fubin Chen
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Accurate wind field modeling over hilly terrain is critical for wind energy, infrastructure safety, and environmental assessment, yet its inherent complexity poses significant simulation challenges. This paper systematically reviews this field’s major advances by analyzing 610 key publications from 2015 to 2024, selected from core databases (e.g., Web of Science and Scopus) through targeted keyword searches (e.g., ‘wind flow’, ‘complex terrain’, ‘CFD’, ‘hilly’) and subsequent rigorous relevance screening. We critique four primary modeling paradigms—field measurements, wind tunnel experiments, Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD), and data-driven methods—across three key application areas, filling a gap left by previous single-focus reviews. The analysis confirms CFD’s dominance (75% of studies), with a clear shift from idealized 2D to real 3D terrain. Key findings indicate that high-fidelity coupled models (e.g., LES), validated against benchmark field experiments such as Perdigão, can reduce mean wind speed prediction bias to below 0.1 m/s; and optimized engineering designs for mountainous infrastructure can mitigate local wind speed amplification effects by 15–20%. Data-driven surrogate models, represented by FuXi-CFD, show revolutionary potential, reducing the inference time for high-resolution wind fields from hours to seconds, though they currently lack standardized validation. Finally, this review summarizes persistent challenges and outlines future directions, advocating for physics-informed neural networks, high-fidelity multi-scale models, and the establishment of open-access benchmark datasets.

Applied SciencesVol. 15(18)
Changsha University of Science and Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Wind and Air Flow Studies
3.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.