Hiring Biased Managers: Kant vs. Nash

Abstract This paper investigates how firm owners select biased managers under different competition modes with Kantian Optimization principle. We show that in both Cournot competition and Bertrand competition, the optimal strategy under Kantian optimization is to hire relatively conservative managers. This stands in contrast to the findings under Nash optimization, where owners optimally choose relatively aggressive managers. Additionally, we demonstrate that the cross effect of a rival firm’s managerial type on a firm’s expected market size does not influence the owner’s optimal choice of manager type.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The B E Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy
Published
2025-09-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/bejeap-2024-0444
Primary Topic
Economic theories and models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hiring Biased Managers: Kant vs. Nash

Jen‐Yao Lee, Di Wu, Leonard F.S. Wang
The B E Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy
Economic theories and models
article

Hiring Biased Managers: Kant vs. Nash

Jen‐Yao Lee, Di Wu, Leonard F.S. Wang
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper investigates how firm owners select biased managers under different competition modes with Kantian Optimization principle. We show that in both Cournot competition and Bertrand competition, the optimal strategy under Kantian optimization is to hire relatively conservative managers. This stands in contrast to the findings under Nash optimization, where owners optimally choose relatively aggressive managers. Additionally, we demonstrate that the cross effect of a rival firm’s managerial type on a firm’s expected market size does not influence the owner’s optimal choice of manager type.

The B E Journal of Economic Analysis & PolicyVol. 25(4)
University of Science and Technology (YE), Nankai University (CN), National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology (TW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Economic theories and models
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.