A Framework for Technology Maturity Assessment Based on Patent and Literature Analysis: A Case Study of Underground Compressed Air and Hydrogen Storage Power Generation

Technological maturity serves as a critical indicator for evaluating the current state of technology development and forecasting future trends. It has been widely applied in high‐tech fields, defense, and strategic emerging industries. This paper develops a multidimensional technology maturity assessment framework based on a comprehensive evaluation of existing maturity assessment methods and relevant application studies. The proposed model correlates computed values with the nine levels of technology readiness levels (TRLs) and the four stages of Theory of Inventive Problem Solving (TRIZ), providing a quantitative supplement to these classifications. Utilizing this evaluation model, the maturity levels of five underground compressed air and hydrogen storage power generation (UCHPG) technologies were assessed. The results, as of 2023, reveal that compressed air energy storage (CAES) has attained the highest TRL of 9. Conversely, hydrogen energy storage and fuel cell (HES‐FC) systems achieved a TRL of 7, hydrogen‐heated CAES (HH‐CAES) and hydrogen energy storage and gas turbine (HES‐GT) systems both reached a TRL of 6, while advanced adiabatic CAES (AA‐CAES) obtained a lower TRL of 5. To validate the proposed assessment model, a comparative analysis was conducted with recent literature on the TRL classifications of these five technologies. The findings indicate that the multicriteria technology maturity evaluation model proposed in this paper is reliable, addressing the limitations of single‐criterion assessment methods and providing a more comprehensive evaluation of technology maturity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Energy Research
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1155/er/9255306
Primary Topic
Technology Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Framework for Technology Maturity Assessment Based on Patent and Literature Analysis: A Case Study of Underground Compressed Air and Hydrogen Storage Power Generation

Yilin Guo, Tianle Shi, Lin Wu, Jianhua Liu et al.
International Journal of Energy Research
Technology Assessment and Management
article

A Framework for Technology Maturity Assessment Based on Patent and Literature Analysis: A Case Study of Underground Compressed Air and Hydrogen Storage Power Generation

Yilin Guo, Tianle Shi, Lin Wu, Jianhua Liu, Liangchao Huang, Zhengmeng Hou, Ru Zhang, Qichen Wang, Hans-Peter Beck
article en

Abstract

Technological maturity serves as a critical indicator for evaluating the current state of technology development and forecasting future trends. It has been widely applied in high‐tech fields, defense, and strategic emerging industries. This paper develops a multidimensional technology maturity assessment framework based on a comprehensive evaluation of existing maturity assessment methods and relevant application studies. The proposed model correlates computed values with the nine levels of technology readiness levels (TRLs) and the four stages of Theory of Inventive Problem Solving (TRIZ), providing a quantitative supplement to these classifications. Utilizing this evaluation model, the maturity levels of five underground compressed air and hydrogen storage power generation (UCHPG) technologies were assessed. The results, as of 2023, reveal that compressed air energy storage (CAES) has attained the highest TRL of 9. Conversely, hydrogen energy storage and fuel cell (HES‐FC) systems achieved a TRL of 7, hydrogen‐heated CAES (HH‐CAES) and hydrogen energy storage and gas turbine (HES‐GT) systems both reached a TRL of 6, while advanced adiabatic CAES (AA‐CAES) obtained a lower TRL of 5. To validate the proposed assessment model, a comparative analysis was conducted with recent literature on the TRL classifications of these five technologies. The findings indicate that the multicriteria technology maturity evaluation model proposed in this paper is reliable, addressing the limitations of single‐criterion assessment methods and providing a more comprehensive evaluation of technology maturity.

International Journal of Energy ResearchVol. 2025(1)
Southwest Petroleum University (CN), Sichuan University (CN), Zhengzhou University (CN), Forschungszentrum Energiespeichertechnologien (DE), Yalong Hydro (China) (CN), Clausthal University of Technology (DE)
European Commission, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Technology Assessment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.