Stakeholders in the Implementation of Artificial Intelligence in the Surgical Field: Challenges and Considerations Ahead

The rapid spread of artificial intelligence (AI) and its vast number of potential applications warrants careful consideration, particularly within plastic and craniofacial surgery. For practicing surgeons, AI may ease administrative burdens, improve imaging analysis, and support surgical planning. Trainees may be both impacted and empowered through the integration of AI into candidate selection processes and educational methods. Researchers could benefit from AI by streamlining simple, repetitive research tasks and improving global access to medical information, although issues of equity and authorship arise. Patients may also turn to AI for information, reassurance, and outcome predictions, potentially leading to misinformation and distorted aesthetic expectations. All stakeholders must navigate the clinical, ethical, and legal challenges ahead to ensure that the implementation of AI prioritizes the patient's welfare at every stage.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
Published
2025-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000011881
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.65
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stakeholders in the Implementation of Artificial Intelligence in the Surgical Field: Challenges and Considerations Ahead

Seth Ray Thaller, Catherine Lynch
1 citations
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
0.65
article

Stakeholders in the Implementation of Artificial Intelligence in the Surgical Field: Challenges and Considerations Ahead

Seth Ray Thaller, Catherine Lynch
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The rapid spread of artificial intelligence (AI) and its vast number of potential applications warrants careful consideration, particularly within plastic and craniofacial surgery. For practicing surgeons, AI may ease administrative burdens, improve imaging analysis, and support surgical planning. Trainees may be both impacted and empowered through the integration of AI into candidate selection processes and educational methods. Researchers could benefit from AI by streamlining simple, repetitive research tasks and improving global access to medical information, although issues of equity and authorship arise. Patients may also turn to AI for information, reassurance, and outcome predictions, potentially leading to misinformation and distorted aesthetic expectations. All stakeholders must navigate the clinical, ethical, and legal challenges ahead to ensure that the implementation of AI prioritizes the patient's welfare at every stage.

Journal of Craniofacial SurgeryVol. 37(3/4)
University of Miami (US), University of Lynchburg (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
0.65
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Stakeholders in the Implementation of Artificial Intelligence in the Surgical Field: Challenges and Considerations Ahead — Seth Ray Thaller, Catherine Lynch · Journal of Craniofacial Surgery (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS