Clinical efficacy of subsequent microvascular free flaps in head and neck reconstructive surgery

Microvascular free flap reconstruction is a standard technique in head and neck surgery with high success rates. Nevertheless, complications like early flap loss, locoregional recurrence of head and neck cancer and osteoradionecrosis may require further flap procedures. This study aims to assess outcomes and challenges associated with subsequent free flap procedures. In this retrospective cohort study, all patients who received subsequent free flaps between January 2013 and December 2022 were assessed and examined by explorative descriptive analysis. Furthermore, one exemplary case is presented. Overall, 69 patients with 150 free flaps were included, with up to 4 subsequently performed flaps. Reasons for subsequent flaps included early failure, local cancer recurrence, osteoradionecrosis and wound healing disorders. After early failures, subsequent flaps were successful in 97 % of this cohort. The more flaps were performed, the more likely the contralateral neck was used for vascular anastomosis and the more likely vein grafts were used. Subsequent free flap procedures are safe and viable options in head and neck reconstruction, even in cases of previous flap failure. Even if previous surgeries, already harvested flaps and radiation therapy might complicate the choice of reconstruction, this should not be a deterrent to achieve consistent rehabilitation of the patient.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2025.09.004
Primary Topic
Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical efficacy of subsequent microvascular free flaps in head and neck reconstructive surgery

Christian Doll, E. Schott, Friedrich Mrosk, Norbert Neckel et al.
Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery
Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
article

Clinical efficacy of subsequent microvascular free flaps in head and neck reconstructive surgery

Christian Doll, E. Schott, Friedrich Mrosk, Norbert Neckel, Carsten Rendenbach, Jan Oliver Voß, Kilian Kreutzer, Steffen Koerdt, Max Heiland, Victoria Vertic, Maximilian Richte
article en

Abstract

Microvascular free flap reconstruction is a standard technique in head and neck surgery with high success rates. Nevertheless, complications like early flap loss, locoregional recurrence of head and neck cancer and osteoradionecrosis may require further flap procedures. This study aims to assess outcomes and challenges associated with subsequent free flap procedures. In this retrospective cohort study, all patients who received subsequent free flaps between January 2013 and December 2022 were assessed and examined by explorative descriptive analysis. Furthermore, one exemplary case is presented. Overall, 69 patients with 150 free flaps were included, with up to 4 subsequently performed flaps. Reasons for subsequent flaps included early failure, local cancer recurrence, osteoradionecrosis and wound healing disorders. After early failures, subsequent flaps were successful in 97 % of this cohort. The more flaps were performed, the more likely the contralateral neck was used for vascular anastomosis and the more likely vein grafts were used. Subsequent free flap procedures are safe and viable options in head and neck reconstruction, even in cases of previous flap failure. Even if previous surgeries, already harvested flaps and radiation therapy might complicate the choice of reconstruction, this should not be a deterrent to achieve consistent rehabilitation of the patient.

Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial SurgeryVol. 53(11)
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.