Uterine cervical volume: comparison between two- and three-dimensional ultrasound methods at 20-24 weeks of gestation

Cervical volume measurements obtained with 2D and 3D ultrasound methods seem to show satisfactory agreement and good intraobserver reliability. In our study sample, the 2D ultrasound method showed low interobserver reliability, whereas the 3D ultrasound method was more reliable, with good intraobserver and interobserver reliability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Radiologia Brasileira
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-3984.2025.0002
Primary Topic
Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Uterine cervical volume: comparison between two- and three-dimensional ultrasound methods at 20-24 weeks of gestation

Fernando Maia Peixoto Filho, Renan Fonseca Cardozo, Edward Araujo Júnior
Radiologia Brasileira
Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management
article

Uterine cervical volume: comparison between two- and three-dimensional ultrasound methods at 20-24 weeks of gestation

Fernando Maia Peixoto Filho, Renan Fonseca Cardozo, Edward Araujo Júnior
article en

Abstract

Cervical volume measurements obtained with 2D and 3D ultrasound methods seem to show satisfactory agreement and good intraobserver reliability. In our study sample, the 2D ultrasound method showed low interobserver reliability, whereas the 3D ultrasound method was more reliable, with good intraobserver and interobserver reliability.

Radiologia BrasileiraVol. 58
Universidade Municipal de São Caetano do Sul (BR), Instituto Nacional de Saúde (MZ), Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (BR), Universidade Federal de São Paulo (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.