A Novel Competency-Based Simulation Model for Thoracoscopic Lung Resection

Simulation-based thoracic surgery training is increasingly incorporating physical models to enhance traditional learning methods. Conventional box trainers, though useful for basic skills, often lack anatomical accuracy and tactile feedback, limiting their relevance for complex procedures like thoracoscopic lung resection. High-fidelity 3D-printed lung models offer realistic anatomy and procedural flow, but their educational impact remains underexplored.Fifty-two surgical residents without prior thoracoscopic experience were randomly assigned to a high-fidelity lung model group or a conventional Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) box trainer group. All participants completed a baseline thoracic anatomy test and received standardized educational materials. The lung model group received structured simulation training on procedural anatomy and operative steps, while the FLS group practiced fundamental laparoscopic tasks. After training, participants repeated the anatomy test and performed a thoracoscopic lung wedge resection in a live animal model. Performance was assessed using the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill (OSATS) and a 5-point confidence scale.A total of 52 surgical residents participated in the study, with 26 assigned to the high-fidelity lung model group and 26 to the FLS trainer group. Baseline anatomy scores were similar between groups (65.42 ± 6.10 vs. 66.12 ± 5.92; <i>p</i> = 0.710). Posttraining, the lung model group showed greater gains in anatomy comprehension (87.60 ± 4.75 vs. 78.19 ± 5.54; <i>p</i> < 0.001), higher OSATS scores (19.18 ± 2.43 vs. 15.41 ± 2.41; <i>p</i> < 0.001), and increased confidence (3.13 ± 0.61 vs. 2.27 ± 0.68; <i>p</i> = 0.002).High-fidelity 3D-printed lung models significantly enhance anatomical understanding, thoracoscopic skills, and confidence compared with conventional box trainers. These results support integrating anatomically accurate simulation into thoracic surgical education to improve both cognitive and psychomotor outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2702-2239
Primary Topic
Surgical Simulation and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Novel Competency-Based Simulation Model for Thoracoscopic Lung Resection

Feng Yang, Ganwei Liu, Zuli Zhou, Guanchao Jiang
The Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon
Surgical Simulation and Training
article

A Novel Competency-Based Simulation Model for Thoracoscopic Lung Resection

Feng Yang, Ganwei Liu, Zuli Zhou, Guanchao Jiang
article en

Abstract

Simulation-based thoracic surgery training is increasingly incorporating physical models to enhance traditional learning methods. Conventional box trainers, though useful for basic skills, often lack anatomical accuracy and tactile feedback, limiting their relevance for complex procedures like thoracoscopic lung resection. High-fidelity 3D-printed lung models offer realistic anatomy and procedural flow, but their educational impact remains underexplored.Fifty-two surgical residents without prior thoracoscopic experience were randomly assigned to a high-fidelity lung model group or a conventional Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) box trainer group. All participants completed a baseline thoracic anatomy test and received standardized educational materials. The lung model group received structured simulation training on procedural anatomy and operative steps, while the FLS group practiced fundamental laparoscopic tasks. After training, participants repeated the anatomy test and performed a thoracoscopic lung wedge resection in a live animal model. Performance was assessed using the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill (OSATS) and a 5-point confidence scale.A total of 52 surgical residents participated in the study, with 26 assigned to the high-fidelity lung model group and 26 to the FLS trainer group. Baseline anatomy scores were similar between groups (65.42 ± 6.10 vs. 66.12 ± 5.92; <i>p</i> = 0.710). Posttraining, the lung model group showed greater gains in anatomy comprehension (87.60 ± 4.75 vs. 78.19 ± 5.54; <i>p</i> < 0.001), higher OSATS scores (19.18 ± 2.43 vs. 15.41 ± 2.41; <i>p</i> < 0.001), and increased confidence (3.13 ± 0.61 vs. 2.27 ± 0.68; <i>p</i> = 0.002).High-fidelity 3D-printed lung models significantly enhance anatomical understanding, thoracoscopic skills, and confidence compared with conventional box trainers. These results support integrating anatomically accurate simulation into thoracic surgical education to improve both cognitive and psychomotor outcomes.

The Thoracic and Cardiovascular SurgeonVol. 74(02)
Peking University (CN), Peking University People's Hospital (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Surgical Simulation and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.