Short-Term Differences in Hospital Resource Utilization and Quality of Care Between Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion and Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy: A National Propensity-Scored Observational Study Utilizing the ACS-NSQIP Database

<b>Background/Objective</b>: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) or posterior cervical foraminotomy (PCF) are common treatments for cervical radiculopathy. This study compared post-operative outcomes between ACDF and PCF utilizing the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. <b>Methods</b>: An observational study following STROBE and TRIPOD + AI guidelines compared hospital resource utilization and quality of care between single-level ACDF and PCF (2005-2022). Primary outcomes compared operative time, length of stay (LOS), and post-operative complications. Propensity-scored stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting adjusted for confounders, specifically demographics, lifestyle-related factors, pre-operative labs, pre-existing comorbidities, and surgery-related factors. Subgroup analysis compared baseline characteristics and outcomes, stratified by 30-day re-admission and re-operation. <b>Results</b>: PCF group demonstrated shorter LOS (MD -0.7 days, 95% CI -0.9 to -0.5 days, <i>p</i> < 0.001), operative time (MD -32.9 min, 95% CI -35.7 to -30.1 min, <i>p</i> < 0.001), higher rate of re-admission associated with overall SSI (PD 1.2%, 95% CI 0.7-1.7%, <i>p</i> < 0.001), deep incisional SSI (PD 0.8%, 95% CI 0.4-1.2%, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and organ/space SSI (PD 0.3%, 95% CI 0.0-0.5%, <i>p</i> = 0.011). Furthermore, the PCF group had greater systemic sepsis (PD 0.8%, 95% CI 0.4-1.3%, <i>p</i> < 0.001), overall post-operative SSI (PD 2.8%, 95% CI 2.0-3.6%, <i>p</i> < 0.001), superficial SSI (PD 1.9%, 95% CI 1.2-2.5%, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and deep incisional SSI (PD 0.8%, 95% CI 0.4-1.2%, <i>p</i> < 0.001) rates. Subgroup analysis showed increased early post-operative re-operation rates in the PCF cohort (PD 23.4%, 95% CI 9.5-37.4%, <i>p</i> = 0.001) and increased early post-operative re-admission associated with post-operative overall SSI (PD 35.3%, 95% CI 22.7-48.0%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). <b>Conclusions</b>: Although the PCF cohort demonstrated lower hospital utilization, it had reduced quality of care and increased post-operative complications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14186438
Primary Topic
Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Short-Term Differences in Hospital Resource Utilization and Quality of Care Between Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion and Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy: A National Propensity-Scored Observational Study Utilizing the ACS-NSQIP Database

Jaskeerat Gujral, Susanna Howard, William C. Welch, Hasan S. Ahmad et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
article

Short-Term Differences in Hospital Resource Utilization and Quality of Care Between Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion and Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy: A National Propensity-Scored Observational Study Utilizing the ACS-NSQIP Database

Jaskeerat Gujral, Susanna Howard, William C. Welch, Hasan S. Ahmad, Yohannes Ghenbot, Jang W. Yoon, Daniel Gao, John D. Arena, John I. Shin, Mert Marcel Dagli, Ali K. Ozturk, Jonathan Sussman
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objective</b>: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) or posterior cervical foraminotomy (PCF) are common treatments for cervical radiculopathy. This study compared post-operative outcomes between ACDF and PCF utilizing the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. <b>Methods</b>: An observational study following STROBE and TRIPOD + AI guidelines compared hospital resource utilization and quality of care between single-level ACDF and PCF (2005-2022). Primary outcomes compared operative time, length of stay (LOS), and post-operative complications. Propensity-scored stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting adjusted for confounders, specifically demographics, lifestyle-related factors, pre-operative labs, pre-existing comorbidities, and surgery-related factors. Subgroup analysis compared baseline characteristics and outcomes, stratified by 30-day re-admission and re-operation. <b>Results</b>: PCF group demonstrated shorter LOS (MD -0.7 days, 95% CI -0.9 to -0.5 days, <i>p</i> < 0.001), operative time (MD -32.9 min, 95% CI -35.7 to -30.1 min, <i>p</i> < 0.001), higher rate of re-admission associated with overall SSI (PD 1.2%, 95% CI 0.7-1.7%, <i>p</i> < 0.001), deep incisional SSI (PD 0.8%, 95% CI 0.4-1.2%, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and organ/space SSI (PD 0.3%, 95% CI 0.0-0.5%, <i>p</i> = 0.011). Furthermore, the PCF group had greater systemic sepsis (PD 0.8%, 95% CI 0.4-1.3%, <i>p</i> < 0.001), overall post-operative SSI (PD 2.8%, 95% CI 2.0-3.6%, <i>p</i> < 0.001), superficial SSI (PD 1.9%, 95% CI 1.2-2.5%, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and deep incisional SSI (PD 0.8%, 95% CI 0.4-1.2%, <i>p</i> < 0.001) rates. Subgroup analysis showed increased early post-operative re-operation rates in the PCF cohort (PD 23.4%, 95% CI 9.5-37.4%, <i>p</i> = 0.001) and increased early post-operative re-admission associated with post-operative overall SSI (PD 35.3%, 95% CI 22.7-48.0%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). <b>Conclusions</b>: Although the PCF cohort demonstrated lower hospital utilization, it had reduced quality of care and increased post-operative complications.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(18)
University of Pennsylvania (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.