Adapting Large Language Models: A Comparative Study of Prompt Engineering and Fine-Tuning

Large Language Models (LLMs) have become foundational tools in natural language processing but adapting them effectively remains a technical and practical challenge. This paper presents a comparative analysis of prompt engineering and fine-tuning as key strategies for customizing LLM behavior. Drawing on secondary data from studies and technical documents, the study evaluates each method in terms of performance, cost-efficiency, robustness, and use-case suitability. The analysis concludes that such fine-tuning results in a higher task-specific accuracy and stability, especially in domain-intensive uses, but that prompt engineering allows a more flexible over-all task as well as having a reduced resource requirement. LoRA and prefix tuning are parameters-efficient methods that are found as potential trade-offs. It has also been noted in the study that there is a variation in the interpretability and risk exposure between the approaches. The findings serve the purpose of assisting developers and researchers in the recommendation of proper adaptation strategies in accordance with the technical constraints and task requirements

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Emerging Research in Engineering and Technology
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63282/3050-922x.ijeret-v6i3p102
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Topic Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Adapting Large Language Models: A Comparative Study of Prompt Engineering and Fine-Tuning

1 citations
International Journal of Emerging Research in Engineering and Technology
Topic Modeling
2.48
article

Adapting Large Language Models: A Comparative Study of Prompt Engineering and Fine-Tuning

article en
1 citations

Abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) have become foundational tools in natural language processing but adapting them effectively remains a technical and practical challenge. This paper presents a comparative analysis of prompt engineering and fine-tuning as key strategies for customizing LLM behavior. Drawing on secondary data from studies and technical documents, the study evaluates each method in terms of performance, cost-efficiency, robustness, and use-case suitability. The analysis concludes that such fine-tuning results in a higher task-specific accuracy and stability, especially in domain-intensive uses, but that prompt engineering allows a more flexible over-all task as well as having a reduced resource requirement. LoRA and prefix tuning are parameters-efficient methods that are found as potential trade-offs. It has also been noted in the study that there is a variation in the interpretability and risk exposure between the approaches. The findings serve the purpose of assisting developers and researchers in the recommendation of proper adaptation strategies in accordance with the technical constraints and task requirements

International Journal of Emerging Research in Engineering and TechnologyVol. 6
R2M Solution (Italy) (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Topic Modeling
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Adapting Large Language Models: A Comparative Study of Prompt Engineering and Fine-Tuning · International Journal of Emerging Research in Engineering and Technology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS