The Nicene Creed: Remembering What It Says; Re‐membering What It Forgot to Say

Abstract The year 2025 marks the 1700th anniversary of the Council of Nicaea in 325 CE and the initial draft of the Nicene Creed. The Nicene Creed continues to be recited and used regularly by almost all Christians today. This demonstrates how instrumental it has been for the Christian church. The way in which this creed and the inner relations within the Godhead were interpreted, however, has had serious consequences for the structure of ecclesial communities. Both the East (Greek) and the West (Latin) structured communities based on and justified by its interpretation of the creed. In both, however, Jesus Christ as a particular vision of human society and discipleship goes missing. For Mennonites, this critical missing piece hinders the full and enthusiastic embrace of the Nicene Creed. Jesus the Christ – the person and economic expression of God’s salvation – was largely forgotten in Nicaea’s formulation. This article will highlight both the gift that the Nicene Creed has been and what it failed to provide to the detriment of the Christian church and faith since the 4th century.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Ecumenical Review
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/erev.12905
Primary Topic
Christian Theology and Mission
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Nicene Creed: Remembering What It Says; Re‐membering What It Forgot to Say

Andrew G. Suderman
The Ecumenical Review
Christian Theology and Mission
article

The Nicene Creed: Remembering What It Says; Re‐membering What It Forgot to Say

Andrew G. Suderman
article en

Abstract

Abstract The year 2025 marks the 1700th anniversary of the Council of Nicaea in 325 CE and the initial draft of the Nicene Creed. The Nicene Creed continues to be recited and used regularly by almost all Christians today. This demonstrates how instrumental it has been for the Christian church. The way in which this creed and the inner relations within the Godhead were interpreted, however, has had serious consequences for the structure of ecclesial communities. Both the East (Greek) and the West (Latin) structured communities based on and justified by its interpretation of the creed. In both, however, Jesus Christ as a particular vision of human society and discipleship goes missing. For Mennonites, this critical missing piece hinders the full and enthusiastic embrace of the Nicene Creed. Jesus the Christ – the person and economic expression of God’s salvation – was largely forgotten in Nicaea’s formulation. This article will highlight both the gift that the Nicene Creed has been and what it failed to provide to the detriment of the Christian church and faith since the 4th century.

The Ecumenical ReviewVol. 77(1-2)
Eastern Mennonite University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Christian Theology and Mission
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.