College Students’ Satisfaction Rating on NEU’s Student Service(Part II: Guidance Office)

Satisfaction rating on the services rendered by Guidance Office was measured using 6-item questionnaire with 7-point Likert scale and was analyzed using parametric statistics because the data satisfy the assumptions of normality and of homogeneity of variances. The survey was distributed to 208 randomly selected College students and yielded a response rate of 98.1%. Respondents were asked to rate Guidance Office concerning its office/venue (VENUE), staff/workers (STAFF), office procedure (PROCED), equipment/facility (EQUIP), service delivery (DELIVER), and service provider competence (COMPETN). The survey instrument underwent content validity evaluation and responses exhibited internal consistency reliability, with an estimated Cronbach’s Alpha of .90. Result of One-Sample t-test (α = .05) showed that the mean satisfaction rating was Good (p < .001), effect size (d) = 1.06 (> large according to Cohen, 1988), 95% CI of Mean Difference (1.07, 1.39). ANOVA test showed statistically significant differences in satisfaction ratings across year levels, p = .001, effect size (partial η) = 28 (medium), observed power = .95. Tukey HSD test revealed that the fourth year students’ rating was significantly higher than first year students’ (p = .050), second year students’ (p = .001) and third year students’ (p = .014). Other pairwise comparisons were found not statistically significantly different (p > .05).

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Knowledge Journal
Published
2024-10-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64303/kj-urc-neu-ssp2uenss-cssr0
Primary Topic
Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

College Students’ Satisfaction Rating on NEU’s Student Service(Part II: Guidance Office)

J. Carlos Viveros García, Zaldy Petorio, Jachelle Anne Terrago
Knowledge Journal
Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues
article

College Students’ Satisfaction Rating on NEU’s Student Service(Part II: Guidance Office)

J. Carlos Viveros García, Zaldy Petorio, Jachelle Anne Terrago
article en

Abstract

Satisfaction rating on the services rendered by Guidance Office was measured using 6-item questionnaire with 7-point Likert scale and was analyzed using parametric statistics because the data satisfy the assumptions of normality and of homogeneity of variances. The survey was distributed to 208 randomly selected College students and yielded a response rate of 98.1%. Respondents were asked to rate Guidance Office concerning its office/venue (VENUE), staff/workers (STAFF), office procedure (PROCED), equipment/facility (EQUIP), service delivery (DELIVER), and service provider competence (COMPETN). The survey instrument underwent content validity evaluation and responses exhibited internal consistency reliability, with an estimated Cronbach’s Alpha of .90. Result of One-Sample t-test (α = .05) showed that the mean satisfaction rating was Good (p < .001), effect size (d) = 1.06 (> large according to Cohen, 1988), 95% CI of Mean Difference (1.07, 1.39). ANOVA test showed statistically significant differences in satisfaction ratings across year levels, p = .001, effect size (partial η) = 28 (medium), observed power = .95. Tukey HSD test revealed that the fourth year students’ rating was significantly higher than first year students’ (p = .050), second year students’ (p = .001) and third year students’ (p = .014). Other pairwise comparisons were found not statistically significantly different (p > .05).

Knowledge Journal
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.