Potential environmental benefits of enforcing best available technology in the Swedish dairy cattle systems

Animal-based food production places significant strain on environmental resources, yet much of its mitigation potential remains untapped. Sweden's Environmental Code (1999) mandates resource efficiency and waste minimization, but its application to reduce on-farm losses in agriculture has not been fully explored. This study examines the potential environmental impact of targeting animal losses through the enforcement of the Environmental Code on Swedish cattle farms. Using data from 4222 dairy cattle farms, we demonstrate that reducing losses on farms exceeding the median loss rate could lead to 2800 t of additional meat reaching the food supply chain annually (34 % reduction in losses), decrease the CO 2 e associated with meat losses by 52,000 t, and recover €15 million in revenue losses. While these reductions represent a small fraction of Sweden's total agricultural emissions, the study suggests the potential could be even greater if applied to all livestock farms nationwide. Importantly, Sweden's Environmental Code aligns with EU legislation, making these findings highly relevant not only for Sweden but also for other EU countries with similar regulatory frameworks. • Farms were categorized into specialized beef, dual purpose or specialized dairy. • Median loss rates in these groups varied widely, at 3 %, 10 %, and 13 %, respectively. • The annual meat loss was 8200 t, or 13 % of the gross production. • Banning loss rates exceeding the median could save 34 % of total meat losses. • Enforcing the Environmental Code could reduce CO 2 e associated with meat losses by 52,000 t and recover €15 M annually.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Research in Environmental Sustainability
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crsust.2025.100306
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Potential environmental benefits of enforcing best available technology in the Swedish dairy cattle systems

Karin Alvåsen, Sanna Pasanen, Mattias Eriksson, Jonas Christensen et al.
1 citations
Current Research in Environmental Sustainability
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
1.72
article

Potential environmental benefits of enforcing best available technology in the Swedish dairy cattle systems

Karin Alvåsen, Sanna Pasanen, Mattias Eriksson, Jonas Christensen, Ingrid Strid
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Animal-based food production places significant strain on environmental resources, yet much of its mitigation potential remains untapped. Sweden's Environmental Code (1999) mandates resource efficiency and waste minimization, but its application to reduce on-farm losses in agriculture has not been fully explored. This study examines the potential environmental impact of targeting animal losses through the enforcement of the Environmental Code on Swedish cattle farms. Using data from 4222 dairy cattle farms, we demonstrate that reducing losses on farms exceeding the median loss rate could lead to 2800 t of additional meat reaching the food supply chain annually (34 % reduction in losses), decrease the CO 2 e associated with meat losses by 52,000 t, and recover €15 million in revenue losses. While these reductions represent a small fraction of Sweden's total agricultural emissions, the study suggests the potential could be even greater if applied to all livestock farms nationwide. Importantly, Sweden's Environmental Code aligns with EU legislation, making these findings highly relevant not only for Sweden but also for other EU countries with similar regulatory frameworks. • Farms were categorized into specialized beef, dual purpose or specialized dairy. • Median loss rates in these groups varied widely, at 3 %, 10 %, and 13 %, respectively. • The annual meat loss was 8200 t, or 13 % of the gross production. • Banning loss rates exceeding the median could save 34 % of total meat losses. • Enforcing the Environmental Code could reduce CO 2 e associated with meat losses by 52,000 t and recover €15 M annually.

Current Research in Environmental SustainabilityVol. 10
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.