The Bystander Typology Scale: Development and Validation of a Workplace Bullying Bystander Response Measure

ABSTRACT Bystanders, organizational members who witness but are not directly involved in workplace bullying, are increasingly viewed as integral in addressing bullying. However, empirical evidence about how bystanders act and why is limited, having been hampered by the lack of a validated measure to capture bystander behavior. Drawing from previous typologies and extending a sensemaking model of bystanders, we theorize that there are four main classes of bystander behavior and that individual and organizational factors influence which of these is enacted when workplace bullying is witnessed. We develop the Bystander Typology Scale (BTS) to test our propositions, validating the new measure across three studies ( N Study 1a = 588; N Study 1b = 361; N Study 1c = 251), which show that the BTS captures four distinctive bystander behaviors: active constructive (e.g., confronting the perpetrator), passive constructive (e.g., offering emotional support), passive destructive (e.g., ignoring the situation), and active destructive (e.g., revictimization). Our main study ( N Study 2 = 374) shows that self‐efficacy, dark triad traits, and organizational conflict cultures influence bystander behavior in distinctive ways. Our research contributes to a greater understanding of how bystanders behave when witnessing bullying and why, alongside a tool for researchers to examine bullying bystanders systemically and for practitioners to evaluate interventions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Organizational Behavior
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/job.70027
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Workplace Violence and Bullying
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Bystander Typology Scale: Development and Validation of a Workplace Bullying Bystander Response Measure

Kara Ng, Karen Niven
2 citations
Journal of Organizational Behavior
Workplace Violence and Bullying
8.40
article

The Bystander Typology Scale: Development and Validation of a Workplace Bullying Bystander Response Measure

Kara Ng, Karen Niven
article en
2 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Bystanders, organizational members who witness but are not directly involved in workplace bullying, are increasingly viewed as integral in addressing bullying. However, empirical evidence about how bystanders act and why is limited, having been hampered by the lack of a validated measure to capture bystander behavior. Drawing from previous typologies and extending a sensemaking model of bystanders, we theorize that there are four main classes of bystander behavior and that individual and organizational factors influence which of these is enacted when workplace bullying is witnessed. We develop the Bystander Typology Scale (BTS) to test our propositions, validating the new measure across three studies ( N Study 1a = 588; N Study 1b = 361; N Study 1c = 251), which show that the BTS captures four distinctive bystander behaviors: active constructive (e.g., confronting the perpetrator), passive constructive (e.g., offering emotional support), passive destructive (e.g., ignoring the situation), and active destructive (e.g., revictimization). Our main study ( N Study 2 = 374) shows that self‐efficacy, dark triad traits, and organizational conflict cultures influence bystander behavior in distinctive ways. Our research contributes to a greater understanding of how bystanders behave when witnessing bullying and why, alongside a tool for researchers to examine bullying bystanders systemically and for practitioners to evaluate interventions.

Journal of Organizational BehaviorVol. 47(1)
University of Manchester (GB), University of Sheffield (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Workplace Violence and Bullying
8.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.