Auditors' Use of Experts: Implications for Audit Quality and Audit Fees

ABSTRACT The audit environment is increasingly complex, and stakeholders are demanding higher‐quality audits. As a result, auditors are increasingly relying on experts across various fields, especially in areas with high estimation uncertainty. While this approach aims to improve audit quality, it has cost implications. Recent studies that used PCAOB data from large US firms have offered valuable insights regarding the general use of experts. Using hand‐collected audit reports data from Norwegian listed companies from 2016 to 2019, we build on the prior insights by focusing on the specific use of experts in high‐risk areas of audit engagements. We find that the use of experts is positively associated with audit fees and negatively associated with absolute discretionary accruals, suggesting higher audit quality. This finding thus extends prior studies by emphasizing that the impact of experts on audit quality is significantly influenced by the specific areas of the audit engagement within which they are deployed. Therefore, our results suggest that to achieve the desired benefits and justify the associated incremental costs, experts should be strategically deployed in the most critical areas of the audit.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Auditing
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.70006
Primary Topic
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Auditors' Use of Experts: Implications for Audit Quality and Audit Fees

Stephen Zamore, Joseph Akadeagre Agana, Gordon Mwintome
International Journal of Auditing
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
article

Auditors' Use of Experts: Implications for Audit Quality and Audit Fees

Stephen Zamore, Joseph Akadeagre Agana, Gordon Mwintome
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT The audit environment is increasingly complex, and stakeholders are demanding higher‐quality audits. As a result, auditors are increasingly relying on experts across various fields, especially in areas with high estimation uncertainty. While this approach aims to improve audit quality, it has cost implications. Recent studies that used PCAOB data from large US firms have offered valuable insights regarding the general use of experts. Using hand‐collected audit reports data from Norwegian listed companies from 2016 to 2019, we build on the prior insights by focusing on the specific use of experts in high‐risk areas of audit engagements. We find that the use of experts is positively associated with audit fees and negatively associated with absolute discretionary accruals, suggesting higher audit quality. This finding thus extends prior studies by emphasizing that the impact of experts on audit quality is significantly influenced by the specific areas of the audit engagement within which they are deployed. Therefore, our results suggest that to achieve the desired benefits and justify the associated incremental costs, experts should be strategically deployed in the most critical areas of the audit.

International Journal of AuditingVol. 30(1)
University of Agder (NO), Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (GH), Agder Research (NO), University of Stavanger (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.