A Framework for Refining Error Metrics in Surrogate Models for Engineering Applications

<div class="section abstract"><div class="htmlview paragraph">Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) is a growing field in engineering design, enabling rapid prototyping and deployment of concepts. However, the quality of engineering simulations depends heavily on the quality of the models used. As a result, quantifying and reducing model error is critical in MBSE. To do this effectively, examining how model error is measured is crucial. Error metrics reduce the complex relationship between predicted and measured behavior to a single scalar value. This compression can introduce bias, but it is necessary for error quantification and surrogate generation. This paper examines the impact of this compression on model behavior and offers a decision framework for choosing error metrics. While not all uncertainty is reducible, modelers should decide which uncertainties are acceptable and how they are measured.</div></div>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4271/2025-01-0475
Primary Topic
Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Framework for Refining Error Metrics in Surrogate Models for Engineering Applications

Gregory Mocko, Edward J. Louis, Evan Taylor
SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series
Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms
article

A Framework for Refining Error Metrics in Surrogate Models for Engineering Applications

Gregory Mocko, Edward J. Louis, Evan Taylor
article en

Abstract

<div class="section abstract"><div class="htmlview paragraph">Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) is a growing field in engineering design, enabling rapid prototyping and deployment of concepts. However, the quality of engineering simulations depends heavily on the quality of the models used. As a result, quantifying and reducing model error is critical in MBSE. To do this effectively, examining how model error is measured is crucial. Error metrics reduce the complex relationship between predicted and measured behavior to a single scalar value. This compression can introduce bias, but it is necessary for error quantification and surrogate generation. This paper examines the impact of this compression on model behavior and offers a decision framework for choosing error metrics. While not all uncertainty is reducible, modelers should decide which uncertainties are acceptable and how they are measured.</div></div>

SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper seriesVol. 1
Clemson University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.