Embodied AI Ethics: A Phenomenological Critique of Current AI Explanation Systems

Current explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) systems face a fundamental challenge, which is the conflict between algorithmic explanations and embodied moral understanding. We examine two typical cases to reveal that human moral understanding possesses irreducible embodied characteristics. These characteristics cannot be fully captured by existing AI explanation technologies. Base on Merleau-Ponty's embodied phenomenology[1], we propose "Embodied AI Ethics" as a new theoretical framework. This framework shifts the focus from making AI more moral to protecting and enhancing human moral capabilities. We demonstrate how current XAI technologies systematically exclude these features. They do this through processes of disembodiment, decontextualization, and desubjectification. Based on these findings, we propose four design principles for embodied AI ethics. These principles provide theoretical guidance for developing AI interfaces that respect and support human moral understanding.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific journal of humanities and social sciences.
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54691/ae128c93
Primary Topic
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Embodied AI Ethics: A Phenomenological Critique of Current AI Explanation Systems

Wenrui Liang
Scientific journal of humanities and social sciences.
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
article

Embodied AI Ethics: A Phenomenological Critique of Current AI Explanation Systems

Wenrui Liang
article en

Abstract

Current explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) systems face a fundamental challenge, which is the conflict between algorithmic explanations and embodied moral understanding. We examine two typical cases to reveal that human moral understanding possesses irreducible embodied characteristics. These characteristics cannot be fully captured by existing AI explanation technologies. Base on Merleau-Ponty's embodied phenomenology[1], we propose "Embodied AI Ethics" as a new theoretical framework. This framework shifts the focus from making AI more moral to protecting and enhancing human moral capabilities. We demonstrate how current XAI technologies systematically exclude these features. They do this through processes of disembodiment, decontextualization, and desubjectification. Based on these findings, we propose four design principles for embodied AI ethics. These principles provide theoretical guidance for developing AI interfaces that respect and support human moral understanding.

Scientific journal of humanities and social sciences.Vol. 7(10)
The University of Sydney (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.