Anatomical Variations of the Aortic Arch and Their Surgical Implications

Background: To determine the frequency of aortic arch types and branching pattern variations in a cohort of patients and assess their surgical relevance. Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional study included 72 patients who underwent computed tomography angiography (CTA) or surgical exploration between June 2023 and June 2024. Arch types (I–III) and branching patterns (classic three-branch, bovine arch, aberrant right subclavian artery, vertebral origin variants, right-sided arch) were classified. Surgical outcomes including operative time, intraoperative adjustments, and complications were analyzed. Results: Type I arch was most frequent (63.9%), followed by Type II (23.6%) and Type III (12.5%). Classic branching pattern was seen in 62.5% of participants, while 37.5% had variations, most commonly bovine arch (20.8%). Patients with variant branching had significantly longer mean operative time (215 ± 30 min vs. 188 ± 25 min, p = 0.03) and required more intraoperative adjustments (p = 0.04), though rates of stroke and 30-day mortality were not significantly different. Conclusion: Aortic arch variations are relatively common and have measurable effects on surgical complexity. Preoperative imaging and individualized planning are critical to reducing operative challenges and optimizing outcomes.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Neonatal Surgery
Published
2025-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63682/jns.v13i1.9155
Primary Topic
Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Anatomical Variations of the Aortic Arch and Their Surgical Implications

Zareen Fatima, Afsheen Khan, Danish Naveed, Rabiullah Ghafoori et al.
Journal of Neonatal Surgery
Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
article

Anatomical Variations of the Aortic Arch and Their Surgical Implications

Zareen Fatima, Afsheen Khan, Danish Naveed, Rabiullah Ghafoori, Ahmad Zakarya, Rabail Tariq, Mamoona Shoukat
article en

Abstract

Background: To determine the frequency of aortic arch types and branching pattern variations in a cohort of patients and assess their surgical relevance. Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional study included 72 patients who underwent computed tomography angiography (CTA) or surgical exploration between June 2023 and June 2024. Arch types (I–III) and branching patterns (classic three-branch, bovine arch, aberrant right subclavian artery, vertebral origin variants, right-sided arch) were classified. Surgical outcomes including operative time, intraoperative adjustments, and complications were analyzed. Results: Type I arch was most frequent (63.9%), followed by Type II (23.6%) and Type III (12.5%). Classic branching pattern was seen in 62.5% of participants, while 37.5% had variations, most commonly bovine arch (20.8%). Patients with variant branching had significantly longer mean operative time (215 ± 30 min vs. 188 ± 25 min, p = 0.03) and required more intraoperative adjustments (p = 0.04), though rates of stroke and 30-day mortality were not significantly different. Conclusion: Aortic arch variations are relatively common and have measurable effects on surgical complexity. Preoperative imaging and individualized planning are critical to reducing operative challenges and optimizing outcomes.

Journal of Neonatal SurgeryVol. 13
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Anatomical Variations of the Aortic Arch and Their Surgical Implications — Zareen Fatima, Afsheen Khan, et al. · Journal of Neonatal Surgery (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS