Clinical Outcomes of Coronectomy: An Overview of Systematic Reviews

ABSTRACT Aim This study aimed to review the current evidence on the clinical outcomes of coronectomy. Methods A study protocol was developed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Guideline for Overviews of Reviews (PRIOR) and registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) under Registration No. CRD4202450552. Furthermore, the reporting of the present systematic review was performed based on the PRISMA checklist. Results Our search strategy yielded 577 articles. Of these, 213 were duplicate studies, and 364 were independently reviewed by two authors for eligibility. Of these, 349 were excluded based on the title and abstract. Fifteen articles were assessed for eligibility; 7 studies were excluded as they did not meet the inclusion criteria. Finally, a total of 8 systematic reviews met the criteria for inclusion, and they were critically reviewed. Conclusion This overview of systematic reviews quantified the incidence of key clinical outcomes following coronectomy for mandibular third molars. The pooled data show a low incidence of inferior alveolar nerve injury (0.55%) and relatively low rates of postoperative complications including pain (10.67%), root migration (7.23%), re‐operation (2.95%) and infection (2.49%). Less common events such as residual enamel (0.08%) and lingual nerve injury (0.086%) were infrequently reported.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Oral Surgery
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ors.70016
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Dental Radiography and Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.79
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical Outcomes of Coronectomy: An Overview of Systematic Reviews

Sam Thomas Kuriadom, Eleni Besi, Feras AlMofreh AlQahtani, Mohammed B. Alshammari
1 citations
Oral Surgery
Dental Radiography and Imaging
1.79
article

Clinical Outcomes of Coronectomy: An Overview of Systematic Reviews

Sam Thomas Kuriadom, Eleni Besi, Feras AlMofreh AlQahtani, Mohammed B. Alshammari
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Aim This study aimed to review the current evidence on the clinical outcomes of coronectomy. Methods A study protocol was developed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Guideline for Overviews of Reviews (PRIOR) and registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) under Registration No. CRD4202450552. Furthermore, the reporting of the present systematic review was performed based on the PRISMA checklist. Results Our search strategy yielded 577 articles. Of these, 213 were duplicate studies, and 364 were independently reviewed by two authors for eligibility. Of these, 349 were excluded based on the title and abstract. Fifteen articles were assessed for eligibility; 7 studies were excluded as they did not meet the inclusion criteria. Finally, a total of 8 systematic reviews met the criteria for inclusion, and they were critically reviewed. Conclusion This overview of systematic reviews quantified the incidence of key clinical outcomes following coronectomy for mandibular third molars. The pooled data show a low incidence of inferior alveolar nerve injury (0.55%) and relatively low rates of postoperative complications including pain (10.67%), root migration (7.23%), re‐operation (2.95%) and infection (2.49%). Less common events such as residual enamel (0.08%) and lingual nerve injury (0.086%) were infrequently reported.

Oral SurgeryVol. 19(1)
Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University (SA), Queen Mary University of London (GB), Ajman University (AE), Barts Health NHS Trust (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Dental Radiography and Imaging
1.79
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.