Unveiling the Influence of Formation Voltage on Li‐Rich Layered Oxide Cathode
Lithium-rich layered oxide (LRLO) cathodes are recognized for their high energy densities, primarily driven by oxygen-related anionic redox activities, yet substantial activation of this process simultaneously induces structural instability. The typical voltage range in academic studies spans 2.0-4.8 V. Although 2.5-4.5 V are generally considered in industrial applications for enhanced capacity retention and electrolyte compatibility, this moderate voltage window leads to reduced capacity. To address energy density limitations, several top battery suppliers propose to separately increase the formation voltage during the initial cycle to enhance capacity, while other companies (e.g., Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd., CATL) claim that this high-voltage formation protocol would exacerbate cycling capacity fading. Herein, we systemically demonstrate that high-voltage formation promotes substantial Li<sup>+</sup> extraction from the transition metal (TM) layers, creating vacancies (in TM layer) that drive in-plane TM migration. This migration triggers a transformation in the OM<sub>6</sub> (M, cation) configuration from O4 (OLi<sub>x</sub>TM<sub>2</sub>) to O5 (OLi<sub>y</sub>TM<sub>1</sub>). Such evolution simultaneously enhances both anionic and cationic redox activity, collectively boosting capacity. Nonetheless, the induced in-plane TM migration would further aggravate out-of-plane TM migration, leading to progressive structural degradation, which has been elucidated as the main reason for cycling capacity fading.
Authors
- Yuan Tian (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1895-0253)
- Christian Schulz (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6401-395X)
- Yizhen Huang
- Yang Sun (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7295-7334)
- Lirong Zheng (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0888-6769)
- Bodry Tegomo Chiogo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4031-0869)
- Chong‐Heng Shen
- Qingsong Wang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5879-8009)
- Niu Liu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2778-002X)
- Deniz Wong (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7126-0019)
- Jiyuan Xue
- Jing Zhang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0734-3263)
- Kang Zhang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4412-6954)
- Yu Qiao (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2191-3875)
- Huan Huang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0698-5683)
- Shi‐Gang Sun (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2327-4090)
- Yilong Chen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5875-2745)
- Jiao Wen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2020-054X)
- Jianhua Yin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4763-7020)
- Yichun Zheng (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4435-9678)
- Yawen Yan
- Lianpeng Li
Institutions
- Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
- Xiamen University (CN)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie (DE)
- Zero to Three (US)
- Institute of High Energy Physics (AT)
- Institute of High Energy Physics (CN)
- Institute of Contemporary History (SI)
- Collaborative Innovation Center of Chemistry for Energy Materials (CN)
- University of Bayreuth (DE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Angewandte Chemie International Edition
- Published
- 2025-09-16
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202515719
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Advancements in Battery Materials
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.73