Algorithmic Tax Power and Constitutional Safeguards: Global Perspectives on AI, Bias, and Digital Tax Justice

The growing use of algorithms and artificial intelligence (AI) systems in tax administration poses significant challenges to constitutional principles that have historically constrained the state’s power to levy taxes. This paper analyses how the automated exercise of taxing authority—here referred to as the “artificial taxing power”—can reproduce biases, obscure decision-making processes, and undermine fundamental rights such as legality, equality, ability to pay, and due process. Based on doctrinal, constitutional, and empirical analysis, the study argues that the Brazilian Constitution, from 1946 to the present, provides a solid foundation for the creation of a Digital Taxpayer Bill of Rights. Comparative experiences (EU, US, China and Latin America) are examined, the risks of generative models (LLMs) are discussed, and a governance agenda is proposed for digital tax justice, including legal, institutional, and technical safeguards to ensure transparency, explainability, and human oversight.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Beijing Law Review
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4236/blr.2025.163094
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Taxation and Compliance Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Algorithmic Tax Power and Constitutional Safeguards: Global Perspectives on AI, Bias, and Digital Tax Justice

Paulo Caliendo
1 citations
Beijing Law Review
Taxation and Compliance Studies
3.13
article

Algorithmic Tax Power and Constitutional Safeguards: Global Perspectives on AI, Bias, and Digital Tax Justice

Paulo Caliendo
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The growing use of algorithms and artificial intelligence (AI) systems in tax administration poses significant challenges to constitutional principles that have historically constrained the state’s power to levy taxes. This paper analyses how the automated exercise of taxing authority—here referred to as the “artificial taxing power”—can reproduce biases, obscure decision-making processes, and undermine fundamental rights such as legality, equality, ability to pay, and due process. Based on doctrinal, constitutional, and empirical analysis, the study argues that the Brazilian Constitution, from 1946 to the present, provides a solid foundation for the creation of a Digital Taxpayer Bill of Rights. Comparative experiences (EU, US, China and Latin America) are examined, the risks of generative models (LLMs) are discussed, and a governance agenda is proposed for digital tax justice, including legal, institutional, and technical safeguards to ensure transparency, explainability, and human oversight.

Beijing Law ReviewVol. 16(03)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Taxation and Compliance Studies
3.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Algorithmic Tax Power and Constitutional Safeguards: Global Perspectives on AI, Bias, and Digital Tax Justice — Paulo Caliendo · Beijing Law Review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS