Novel Causal Evidence for the Role of Circulating Lipid Metabolites in Breast Cancer Risk: A Bidirectional Mendelian Randomization Analysis

<b>Background:</b> Dysregulated lipid metabolism has been implicated in breast cancer pathogenesis; however, the causal nature of these associations remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the causal relationships between circulating lipid metabolites and the risk of estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) and ER-negative (ER-) breast cancer using a bidirectional Mendelian randomization (MR) approach. <b>Methods:</b> We evaluated 386 circulating lipid metabolites as exposures in two-sample MR analyses, with ER+ and ER- breast cancer as outcomes. Genetic instruments were selected based on genome-wide significance (<i>p</i> < 1 × 10<sup>-5</sup>) and linkage disequilibrium clumping (<i>R</i> <sup>2</sup> < 0.01 within a 1000 kb window). The inverse variance weighted method was used as the primary analytical approach. Sensitivity analyses-including MR-Egger regression, Cochran's <i>Q</i> test, and leave-one-out analyses-were conducted to assess pleiotropy and heterogeneity. Validation analyses were performed using an independent genome-wide association study (GWAS) dataset for ER+ breast cancer. Reverse MR analysis was also conducted to evaluate potential reverse causality. <b>Results:</b> Among the 386 lipid metabolites analyzed, 24 and 23 exhibited nominal associations (<i>p</i> < 0.05) with ER+ and ER- breast cancer, respectively. After applying false discovery rate (FDR) correction (FDR < 0.05), three metabolites-myristoleate (14:1n5), tricosanoyl sphingomyelin (d18:1/23:0), and 5α-androstan-3β, 17β-diol monosulfate (2)-remained significantly associated with an increased risk of ER+ breast cancer. In contrast, none of the associations with ER- breast cancer remained significant after FDR correction. Sensitivity analyses indicated no evidence of horizontal pleiotropy or heterogeneity, and the associations remained robust in leave-one-out analyses. These findings were further validated in an independent GWAS dataset. Moreover, reverse MR analysis found no evidence supporting a causal effect of ER+ breast cancer on the levels of the three identified lipid metabolites. <b>Conclusions:</b> This study provides robust genetic evidence supporting a causal role for specific lipid metabolites in the development of ER+ breast cancer. These metabolites may serve as potential biomarkers for early detection and targets for preventive interventions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Nutrition and Metabolism
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1155/jnme/2292774
Primary Topic
Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Novel Causal Evidence for the Role of Circulating Lipid Metabolites in Breast Cancer Risk: A Bidirectional Mendelian Randomization Analysis

Fei Ma, Yujing Tan, Yuhan Wei, Haili Qian et al.
Journal of Nutrition and Metabolism
Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism
article

Novel Causal Evidence for the Role of Circulating Lipid Metabolites in Breast Cancer Risk: A Bidirectional Mendelian Randomization Analysis

Fei Ma, Yujing Tan, Yuhan Wei, Haili Qian, Jiani Wang, Cheng Zeng, Shuning Liu, Yalong Qi
article en

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Dysregulated lipid metabolism has been implicated in breast cancer pathogenesis; however, the causal nature of these associations remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the causal relationships between circulating lipid metabolites and the risk of estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) and ER-negative (ER-) breast cancer using a bidirectional Mendelian randomization (MR) approach. <b>Methods:</b> We evaluated 386 circulating lipid metabolites as exposures in two-sample MR analyses, with ER+ and ER- breast cancer as outcomes. Genetic instruments were selected based on genome-wide significance (<i>p</i> < 1 × 10<sup>-5</sup>) and linkage disequilibrium clumping (<i>R</i> <sup>2</sup> < 0.01 within a 1000 kb window). The inverse variance weighted method was used as the primary analytical approach. Sensitivity analyses-including MR-Egger regression, Cochran's <i>Q</i> test, and leave-one-out analyses-were conducted to assess pleiotropy and heterogeneity. Validation analyses were performed using an independent genome-wide association study (GWAS) dataset for ER+ breast cancer. Reverse MR analysis was also conducted to evaluate potential reverse causality. <b>Results:</b> Among the 386 lipid metabolites analyzed, 24 and 23 exhibited nominal associations (<i>p</i> < 0.05) with ER+ and ER- breast cancer, respectively. After applying false discovery rate (FDR) correction (FDR < 0.05), three metabolites-myristoleate (14:1n5), tricosanoyl sphingomyelin (d18:1/23:0), and 5α-androstan-3β, 17β-diol monosulfate (2)-remained significantly associated with an increased risk of ER+ breast cancer. In contrast, none of the associations with ER- breast cancer remained significant after FDR correction. Sensitivity analyses indicated no evidence of horizontal pleiotropy or heterogeneity, and the associations remained robust in leave-one-out analyses. These findings were further validated in an independent GWAS dataset. Moreover, reverse MR analysis found no evidence supporting a causal effect of ER+ breast cancer on the levels of the three identified lipid metabolites. <b>Conclusions:</b> This study provides robust genetic evidence supporting a causal role for specific lipid metabolites in the development of ER+ breast cancer. These metabolites may serve as potential biomarkers for early detection and targets for preventive interventions.

Journal of Nutrition and MetabolismVol. 2025(1)
Sun Yat-sen University (CN), Capital Medical University (CN), Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN), Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center (CN), Beijing Friendship Hospital (CN)
China Medical Board, National Natural Science Foundation of China, National Science and Technology Major Project
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.