A Retrospective Study on Prognostic Factors and Systemic Treatments of Refractory Meningiomas

Standard systemic treatment has not been established for refractory meningioma. This retrospective study aimed to identify prognostic factors for overall survival and document outcomes of systemic therapies. We reviewed patients with meningioma followed at CHUM hospital between 2006 and 2022. Only patients with progression after first-line treatment were included. Among 750 patients, 107 (14%) experienced progression after first-line treatment. They were divided into two groups: Group 1 (<i>n</i> = 69, 64%) received salvage local treatments, and Group 2 (<i>n</i> = 38, 36%) received additional salvage systemic treatments. The median follow-up time from diagnosis was 7.5 years. 10-year OS was 88.3% (Group 1) vs. 67.2% (Group 2) (<i>p</i> = 0.009). Mean survival after stopping systemic treatment was 8.94 months. Key prognostic factors for poorer survival included age ≥ 65 (HR = 2.82; <i>p</i> = 0.009), WHO grade 2 or 3 (HR = 4.25; <i>p</i> = 0.004), and progression after second-line treatment (HR = 4.77; <i>p</i> = 0.004). Bevacizumab was associated with a mPFS of 12 months and 1-year OS of 64,6%, whereas non-Bevacizumab treatments-including Hydroxyurea, Somatostatin, and Sunitinib-were associated with a mPFS of 7 months and 1-year OS of 52,6%. This study highlights the fatal nature of recurrent meningiomas and the urgent need for systemic treatments that can improve their survival.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Oncology
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32090516
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Meningioma and schwannoma management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.71
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Retrospective Study on Prognostic Factors and Systemic Treatments of Refractory Meningiomas

Cyril Nader, Moujahed Labidi, Marie Florescu, Carole Lambert et al.
2 citations
Current Oncology
Meningioma and schwannoma management
2.71
article

A Retrospective Study on Prognostic Factors and Systemic Treatments of Refractory Meningiomas

Cyril Nader, Moujahed Labidi, Marie Florescu, Carole Lambert, David Roberge, Bernard Lemieux, Sarah Lapointe, Robert Moumdjian, Émilie Lemieux‐Blanchard, Jean-Paul Bahary, Romain Cayrol, Laura Masucci, Karl Bélanger, Dan-Thanh Christine Nguyen
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Standard systemic treatment has not been established for refractory meningioma. This retrospective study aimed to identify prognostic factors for overall survival and document outcomes of systemic therapies. We reviewed patients with meningioma followed at CHUM hospital between 2006 and 2022. Only patients with progression after first-line treatment were included. Among 750 patients, 107 (14%) experienced progression after first-line treatment. They were divided into two groups: Group 1 (<i>n</i> = 69, 64%) received salvage local treatments, and Group 2 (<i>n</i> = 38, 36%) received additional salvage systemic treatments. The median follow-up time from diagnosis was 7.5 years. 10-year OS was 88.3% (Group 1) vs. 67.2% (Group 2) (<i>p</i> = 0.009). Mean survival after stopping systemic treatment was 8.94 months. Key prognostic factors for poorer survival included age ≥ 65 (HR = 2.82; <i>p</i> = 0.009), WHO grade 2 or 3 (HR = 4.25; <i>p</i> = 0.004), and progression after second-line treatment (HR = 4.77; <i>p</i> = 0.004). Bevacizumab was associated with a mPFS of 12 months and 1-year OS of 64,6%, whereas non-Bevacizumab treatments-including Hydroxyurea, Somatostatin, and Sunitinib-were associated with a mPFS of 7 months and 1-year OS of 52,6%. This study highlights the fatal nature of recurrent meningiomas and the urgent need for systemic treatments that can improve their survival.

Current OncologyVol. 32(9)
Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Meningioma and schwannoma management
2.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.