Use of modal particle <i>of</i> in Old Icelandic prose

Abstract Old Icelandic had an enigmatic preverbal particle of in prose until the second quarter of the 13 th century. In 1929, Kuhn argued that this was a modal particle of potentiality, different from a preverbal of particle in Old Norse poetry of unclear meaning. Kuhn demonstrated that most of the Icelandic of particles appear in three types of clauses related to potentiality. This article adds a fourth type, which allows 90 % of the particles to be included in such clauses. The article equates ›potentiality‹ to be the modality of the modal verb mega ›be able to, can‹. This facilitates a discussion on why the of particle appears primarily in these four types of clauses. Furthermore, main verbs in the indicative past tense are shown to be missing from clauses having the Icelandic of particle.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur (PBB)
Published
2025-09-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/bgsl-2025-0026
Primary Topic
Linguistics and language evolution
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Use of modal particle of in Old Icelandic prose

Þorgeir Sigurðsson
Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur (PBB)
Linguistics and language evolution
article

Use of modal particle of in Old Icelandic prose

Þorgeir Sigurðsson
article en

Abstract

Abstract Old Icelandic had an enigmatic preverbal particle of in prose until the second quarter of the 13 th century. In 1929, Kuhn argued that this was a modal particle of potentiality, different from a preverbal of particle in Old Norse poetry of unclear meaning. Kuhn demonstrated that most of the Icelandic of particles appear in three types of clauses related to potentiality. This article adds a fourth type, which allows 90 % of the particles to be included in such clauses. The article equates ›potentiality‹ to be the modality of the modal verb mega ›be able to, can‹. This facilitates a discussion on why the of particle appears primarily in these four types of clauses. Furthermore, main verbs in the indicative past tense are shown to be missing from clauses having the Icelandic of particle.

Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur (PBB)Vol. 147(3)
Reykjavík Energy (Iceland) (IS)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Linguistics and language evolution
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.