The disenchantment and reconstruction of the “study abroad myth” under the Critical Theory of Adorno’s cultural industry

This study mainly draws on Adorno’s critical theory of cultural industry and uses the method of critical discourse analysis to conduct a qualitative investigation of the discourse of “study abroad myth” in contemporary China. The analysis covers three dimensions: text level, discourse practice, and social and cultural practice. The findings reveal that the “study-abroad myth” is characterized by a standardized yet pseudo- individualized narrative structure. Through mechanisms such as intermediary services, elite university rankings, and curated success stories, overseas education is commodified, constructing an illusory cycle of “demand and satisfaction” while obscuring the ideological logic of educational alienation and the reproduction of cultural capital. At the same time, as “degree devaluation” and employment challenges among returnees emerge, some international students have begun to critically reflect on the dominant myth, reconstructing their self-identities and suggesting potential pathways toward the revaluation of education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SHS Web of Conferences
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202522204019
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Higher Education Governance and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The disenchantment and reconstruction of the “study abroad myth” under the Critical Theory of Adorno’s cultural industry

Zhen Yan
1 citations
SHS Web of Conferences
Higher Education Governance and Development
8.52
article

The disenchantment and reconstruction of the “study abroad myth” under the Critical Theory of Adorno’s cultural industry

Zhen Yan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study mainly draws on Adorno’s critical theory of cultural industry and uses the method of critical discourse analysis to conduct a qualitative investigation of the discourse of “study abroad myth” in contemporary China. The analysis covers three dimensions: text level, discourse practice, and social and cultural practice. The findings reveal that the “study-abroad myth” is characterized by a standardized yet pseudo- individualized narrative structure. Through mechanisms such as intermediary services, elite university rankings, and curated success stories, overseas education is commodified, constructing an illusory cycle of “demand and satisfaction” while obscuring the ideological logic of educational alienation and the reproduction of cultural capital. At the same time, as “degree devaluation” and employment challenges among returnees emerge, some international students have begun to critically reflect on the dominant myth, reconstructing their self-identities and suggesting potential pathways toward the revaluation of education.

SHS Web of ConferencesVol. 222
Universiti Putra Malaysia (MY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Higher Education Governance and Development
8.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.