A Comparative Perspective on Machine Learning and AI for Credit Risk Assessment in Banking: Regulatory Transparency and Decision Traceability

This paper explores the relevance of Machine Learning (ML) in credit risk assessment within the banking and financial sector, particularly in comparison to Artificial Intelligence (AI)-driven decisioning systems. While both technologies contribute to enhancing credit evaluation frameworks, ML offers greater transparency and traceability in model outputs, making it more suitable for regulated environments. One of the key advantages of ML lies in its ability to backtrack and analyse rejected applications—an essential requirement for compliance, especially when financial regulators like the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) demand justifications for rejection. Unlike black-box AI models, ML models provide segment level insights and allow for interpretable rule-based classification. This paper argues that while AI may assist in broader customer segmentation and behavioural prediction, it falls short in decision transparency. Thus, ML emerges as the more appropriate tool for actionable credit decisions in regulatory-bound systems, enabling institutions to ensure explainability, fairness, and accountability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54646/ijism.2025.06
Primary Topic
Insurance and Financial Risk Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Perspective on Machine Learning and AI for Credit Risk Assessment in Banking: Regulatory Transparency and Decision Traceability

Nirajkumar Kantitilal Patitil
Insurance and Financial Risk Management
article

A Comparative Perspective on Machine Learning and AI for Credit Risk Assessment in Banking: Regulatory Transparency and Decision Traceability

Nirajkumar Kantitilal Patitil
article en

Abstract

This paper explores the relevance of Machine Learning (ML) in credit risk assessment within the banking and financial sector, particularly in comparison to Artificial Intelligence (AI)-driven decisioning systems. While both technologies contribute to enhancing credit evaluation frameworks, ML offers greater transparency and traceability in model outputs, making it more suitable for regulated environments. One of the key advantages of ML lies in its ability to backtrack and analyse rejected applications—an essential requirement for compliance, especially when financial regulators like the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) demand justifications for rejection. Unlike black-box AI models, ML models provide segment level insights and allow for interpretable rule-based classification. This paper argues that while AI may assist in broader customer segmentation and behavioural prediction, it falls short in decision transparency. Thus, ML emerges as the more appropriate tool for actionable credit decisions in regulatory-bound systems, enabling institutions to ensure explainability, fairness, and accountability.

Vol. 2(1)
Sikkim University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Insurance and Financial Risk Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.