THE WILD IN THE CITY: DIFFERENT CONCEPTS AND THEIR ROLE IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF URBAN COMMUNITY GARDENS OF GOUTTE D'OR DISTRICT OF PARIS.

In this article, I explore how different conceptions of the relationship between humans and non-human living beings shape the practices involved in the construction of two community gardens in the Goutte d’Or neighborhood of Paris. I draw on concepts from the research field — such as wild and laissezfaire nature — to discuss contrasting understandings of urban nature. In these gardens, conceptions grounded in a human–nature divide seem to prevail, resulting in a conservationist approach to their development. The practices stemming from this perspective appear to be in constant tension with some of the gardens’ goals, such as increasing urban biodiversity and providing spaces for human socialization. Reflecting on how perspectives on the human–nature relationship influences the constitution of community gardens in the city looks to be essential when discussing them as a form of public policy.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Revista Andaluza de Antropología
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12795/raa.2025.i28.03
Primary Topic
Urban Agriculture and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

THE WILD IN THE CITY: DIFFERENT CONCEPTS AND THEIR ROLE IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF URBAN COMMUNITY GARDENS OF GOUTTE D'OR DISTRICT OF PARIS.

Marina Abrão Ballak Dias
Revista Andaluza de Antropología
Urban Agriculture and Sustainability
article

THE WILD IN THE CITY: DIFFERENT CONCEPTS AND THEIR ROLE IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF URBAN COMMUNITY GARDENS OF GOUTTE D'OR DISTRICT OF PARIS.

Marina Abrão Ballak Dias
article en

Abstract

In this article, I explore how different conceptions of the relationship between humans and non-human living beings shape the practices involved in the construction of two community gardens in the Goutte d’Or neighborhood of Paris. I draw on concepts from the research field — such as wild and laissezfaire nature — to discuss contrasting understandings of urban nature. In these gardens, conceptions grounded in a human–nature divide seem to prevail, resulting in a conservationist approach to their development. The practices stemming from this perspective appear to be in constant tension with some of the gardens’ goals, such as increasing urban biodiversity and providing spaces for human socialization. Reflecting on how perspectives on the human–nature relationship influences the constitution of community gardens in the city looks to be essential when discussing them as a form of public policy.

Revista Andaluza de Antropología(28)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Urban Agriculture and Sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.