Comparative Evaluation of Two Supraglottic Airway Devices: Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway (ILMA) and Ambu Aura-i for Blind Tracheal Intubation in Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Background: Supraglottic airway devices (SGD) are a group of airway devices that can be inserted into the pharynx to allow ventilation, oxygenation, and administration of anesthetic gases. These devices are used for primary airway management, rescue ventilation when facemask ventilation is difficult, and as a conduit for endotracheal intubation.Aim of the study: Was to compare between intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA) and Ambu Aura-i as regards success rate for blind endotracheal intubation in adults undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia.Results: 100 patients were randomly divided into two equal groups. Group A (n= 50) were intubated using ILMA, whereas those in group B (n= 50) were blindly intubated using Ambu Aura-i. The data demonstrated that success rate for blind intubation in group A 86.9% while in group B 72.3% (p value= 0.122). Time for endotracheal intubation in seconds was 97±24.279 in the group A while it was 102.94±32.755 in group B (P= 0.374). Time required for placement of SGDs in seconds was 56.80±14.480 in group A while it was 66.38±31.514 (p= 0.064). Number of attempts for SGDs in the first attempt (ILMA= 36/72, 72%; Ambu Aura-i 36/72, 72%), in the second attempts (ILMA= 10/21, 20%; Ambu Aura-i= 11/21, 22%) in the third attempts (ILMA= 4/7, 8%; Ambu Aura-i= 3/7, 6%) (P= 0.870). Group A 46/93, 92% while in group B 47/93, 94%) (p= 1). Change >20% of baseline vital data was recorded e.g. mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) (p= 0.281) while Heart rate (p= 0.926). Complications e.g. blood on endotracheal tube (ETT) (p= 0.554), blood on SGDs (p= 0.836), abdominal pain (p= 1), Hoarseness of voice (p= 0.585) & desaturation, aspiration, laryngospasm & laryngeal edema) weren’t noted.Conclusion: Ambu Aura-i and ILMA are good tools for maintaining ventilation and oxygenation. There is no difference between ILMA & Ambu Aura-i as regards successful blind intubation so Ambu Aura-i a comparable alternative to ILMA for blind tracheal intubation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ain-Shams Journal of Anaesthesiology
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21608/asja.2024.259559.1053
Primary Topic
Airway Management and Intubation Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Evaluation of Two Supraglottic Airway Devices: Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway (ILMA) and Ambu Aura-i for Blind Tracheal Intubation in Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Sara Taha, Ibrahim Mohamed, Ahmed Maksoud, Adel N. Shenouda et al.
Ain-Shams Journal of Anaesthesiology
Airway Management and Intubation Techniques
article

Comparative Evaluation of Two Supraglottic Airway Devices: Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway (ILMA) and Ambu Aura-i for Blind Tracheal Intubation in Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Sara Taha, Ibrahim Mohamed, Ahmed Maksoud, Adel N. Shenouda, Dina Abo Dief
article en

Abstract

Background: Supraglottic airway devices (SGD) are a group of airway devices that can be inserted into the pharynx to allow ventilation, oxygenation, and administration of anesthetic gases. These devices are used for primary airway management, rescue ventilation when facemask ventilation is difficult, and as a conduit for endotracheal intubation.Aim of the study: Was to compare between intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA) and Ambu Aura-i as regards success rate for blind endotracheal intubation in adults undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia.Results: 100 patients were randomly divided into two equal groups. Group A (n= 50) were intubated using ILMA, whereas those in group B (n= 50) were blindly intubated using Ambu Aura-i. The data demonstrated that success rate for blind intubation in group A 86.9% while in group B 72.3% (p value= 0.122). Time for endotracheal intubation in seconds was 97±24.279 in the group A while it was 102.94±32.755 in group B (P= 0.374). Time required for placement of SGDs in seconds was 56.80±14.480 in group A while it was 66.38±31.514 (p= 0.064). Number of attempts for SGDs in the first attempt (ILMA= 36/72, 72%; Ambu Aura-i 36/72, 72%), in the second attempts (ILMA= 10/21, 20%; Ambu Aura-i= 11/21, 22%) in the third attempts (ILMA= 4/7, 8%; Ambu Aura-i= 3/7, 6%) (P= 0.870). Group A 46/93, 92% while in group B 47/93, 94%) (p= 1). Change >20% of baseline vital data was recorded e.g. mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) (p= 0.281) while Heart rate (p= 0.926). Complications e.g. blood on endotracheal tube (ETT) (p= 0.554), blood on SGDs (p= 0.836), abdominal pain (p= 1), Hoarseness of voice (p= 0.585) & desaturation, aspiration, laryngospasm & laryngeal edema) weren’t noted.Conclusion: Ambu Aura-i and ILMA are good tools for maintaining ventilation and oxygenation. There is no difference between ILMA & Ambu Aura-i as regards successful blind intubation so Ambu Aura-i a comparable alternative to ILMA for blind tracheal intubation.

Ain-Shams Journal of AnaesthesiologyVol. 17(1)
Ain Shams University (EG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Airway Management and Intubation Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.