A comprehensive framework for building flexibility assessment: RC-Mapping modeling, flexibility quantification, and uncertainty analysis

Abstract The increasing integration of renewable energy sources highlights the urgent need for grid flexibility, with buildings serving as key controllable loads. In this context, accurately quantifying building flexibility is essential for enabling effective demand-side management and ensuring reliable grid operations. However, several challenges hinder this quantification. To address these issues, this study proposes a comprehensive flexibility quantification framework. First, a novel RC-Mapping model incorporating an Enumerate-Comparison Method is proposed. The RC-Mapping model can capture the thermal behavior of both the building and the air conditioning system, while the Enumerate-Comparison Method can initialize state parameters in the RC-Mapping model. Compared with the conventional approach, as validated by the experiment, the proposed method can substantially improve RMSE for indoor temperature prediction from 0.542 °C to 0.266 °C, and the MAPE for flexibility quantification from 27.58% to 10.98%. Second, the study introduces the power reduction-duration curve and temperature variation curves to characterize flexibility from both grid and building perspectives. Specifically, based on the analysis of the power reduction-duration curve, this study provides a systematic analysis of four sources of flexibility and their underlying mechanisms, including the thermal storage of the building, the thermal storage of the HVAC system, the increase of coefficient of performance (COP), and the reduction in cooling load. Finally, the study investigates the impact of uncertainties in COP and internal heat gains on flexibility quantification. According to the result, it is recommended to slightly underestimate the COP and overestimate the internal heat gain schedule to improve the accuracy of flexibility quantification.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Building Simulation
Published
2025-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-025-1348-1
Primary Topic
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comprehensive framework for building flexibility assessment: RC-Mapping modeling, flexibility quantification, and uncertainty analysis

Pengyuan Shen, Yongjun Sun, Huilong Wang, Xiyin Weng
Building Simulation
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
article

A comprehensive framework for building flexibility assessment: RC-Mapping modeling, flexibility quantification, and uncertainty analysis

Pengyuan Shen, Yongjun Sun, Huilong Wang, Xiyin Weng
article en

Abstract

Abstract The increasing integration of renewable energy sources highlights the urgent need for grid flexibility, with buildings serving as key controllable loads. In this context, accurately quantifying building flexibility is essential for enabling effective demand-side management and ensuring reliable grid operations. However, several challenges hinder this quantification. To address these issues, this study proposes a comprehensive flexibility quantification framework. First, a novel RC-Mapping model incorporating an Enumerate-Comparison Method is proposed. The RC-Mapping model can capture the thermal behavior of both the building and the air conditioning system, while the Enumerate-Comparison Method can initialize state parameters in the RC-Mapping model. Compared with the conventional approach, as validated by the experiment, the proposed method can substantially improve RMSE for indoor temperature prediction from 0.542 °C to 0.266 °C, and the MAPE for flexibility quantification from 27.58% to 10.98%. Second, the study introduces the power reduction-duration curve and temperature variation curves to characterize flexibility from both grid and building perspectives. Specifically, based on the analysis of the power reduction-duration curve, this study provides a systematic analysis of four sources of flexibility and their underlying mechanisms, including the thermal storage of the building, the thermal storage of the HVAC system, the increase of coefficient of performance (COP), and the reduction in cooling load. Finally, the study investigates the impact of uncertainties in COP and internal heat gains on flexibility quantification. According to the result, it is recommended to slightly underestimate the COP and overestimate the internal heat gain schedule to improve the accuracy of flexibility quantification.

Building SimulationVol. 18(11)
City University of Hong Kong (HK), Shenzhen University (CN), Tsinghua–Berkeley Shenzhen Institute (CN), Tsinghua University (CN)
City University of Hong Kong, National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.